CV and mad panic behaviour

[LP]

On the political side of things, as dissatisfied as we are with the actions of many and hold an expectation for change, history tends to favour incumbents in times of plague, pestilence and conflict.

[Mav]

https://www.smh.com.au/national/unqualif...58c1f.html

Proof of the strategy appeared to be in the pudding.

>

OMG, has a saying ever been more mangled? The proof is never in the pudding unless police are investigating whether a poisoned pudding did someone in. The proof of the pudding is in the eating.

[LP]

>

OMG, has a saying ever been more mangled? The proof is never in the pudding unless police are investigating whether a poisoned pudding did someone in. The proof of the pudding is in the eating.

Come on [member=122]Mav[/member]‍ you have to love a twice mangled mixed metaphorical tautology, nothing is better than embedding a tongue twister into the proof.

[LP]

When I first joined this forum I thought he was an app that would automatically have an opinion on everything, absolutely everything.

@Baggers‍ 
https://youtu.be/SxBkN5UsPz0?t=3

[Mav]

I love how some sayings degenerate over time.

Everyone knows the saying, “The exception proves the rule.” It’s used by people to suggest that a few instances that defy the rule make the rule more credible. But it actually means that if you exclude things inconsistent with the rule in the statement of the rule, you end up with a rule that you can show to be true. So “With the exception of some marsupials, mammals don’t lay eggs” is true and useful (unless I’ve missed some others).

An even better example is, “All right, but apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, a fresh water system, and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?”

Funny how things end up meaning the opposite ...

[Baggers]

@Baggers‍
https://youtu.be/SxBkN5UsPz0?t=3

)  )  )  )  glad you took my observations about your good self with the good-hearted spirit with which they were intended.    ;D

[Gointocarlton]

Binchicken is a snake and has gotten lucky too many times (Ruby princess, etc) and hopefully this is it.

she is doing a good job of saying it's the FEd's fault now and even the language of Chant 'National emergency' - ah ha - so you were both sniping Vic from the sidelines our long lockdown last year and Binchicken even had the audacity to be smug about Vic's success last week or the week before, and now oh it's a national emergency? not your incompetency? nor your no guts to actually do what needed to be done to reign it in before numbers exploded?

HOpefully the good of this will see her and scumo fighting, pair of dirty rats. 

How is anyone still saying Scumo is doing a good job, it is bewildering.  he and binchicken have both ridden a wave of luck and i cant believe people aren't seeing thru their bullcrap.

How long will Big M tolerate Berrijekylandhyde "slagging" him and his government?

[Thryleon]

The problem I have with this #3 perspective is that it is basically stated in ignorance of the flip side of the actions of any vaccine, that is keeping hospitalisation numbers low by reducing / preventing severe disease.

It's a weird sort of an argument, like claiming you can use a gun to stop the enemy killing you, like the cause and event is unidirectional.

It's an argument that you virtually contradict in point #4, but that also is asymmetrical because #4 without explicitly stating it implies the risk from the vaccine and Sars-CoV-2 is equal or proportional, but it isn't.

I think as Mav, Baggers or DJC pointed out before, the correct way to look at this what would be the outcome of 6 Million COVID cases versus 6 Million vaccinations. It's a fair question and a very fair comparison to make, because without vaccination we will eventually get to 6 Million COVID cases based on current Sars-CoV-2 virality, it would only be a matter of time. Should we do that math based on global averages?

Actually, I've heard the #3 argument before, .............. it's a dressed up something like the NRA claiming more guns will mean less crime, where they completely ignore the criminal effects of having more guns available?

Like I said, understand the way the data works, and youll arrive at the conclusion.

25 million double vaccinated people will yield x amount of deaths (currently .009 of 6 million).

Covids numbers are similar in our population, and this is an argument that will be hijacked (much like you have here) and the point was made to show you how this is going to be presented (is being presented).

#4 doesnt contradict it.  They are both true observations of how this is going to pan out.

Just call me predicting the future.

[LP]

25 million double vaccinated people will yield x amount of deaths (currently .009 of 6 million).

Are there any vaccine related deaths from the second dose?

[flyboy77]

Sell your shares, if you're an investor it's yet another failed bet.

Bad luck for those selling boot loads of the fake stuff from gymnasium carparks, getting some comeuppance like the bog roll hoarders! :o

Biggest beat up ever.

The study was withdrawn before the author was given the opportunity to address/respond to the alleged deficiencies.

And even if dodgy stuff was going on with that study, it doesn't effect the veracity of every other study.

The stuff works but actions like this are uber convenient for big pharma and governments.

https://c19ivermectin.com/