Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
AFL Finals 2024 Carlton vs Brisbane in Brisbane
(09-07-2024, 08:36 AM)LP link Wrote:Not sure that makes sense, it may be he's not as fit as the MC suggest, and if so that's a wrong selection!

I like it.

3 quarter time we are up by 10 goals then he's not required.

Down by 2 goals and we need a hero, bring him on.
2012 HAPPENED!!!!!!!
Unless someone is going to get injured in the warm up and TDK starts and Cincotta sub.
2012 HAPPENED!!!!!!!
(09-07-2024, 08:35 AM)madbluboy link Wrote:TDK sub
Yeah, we’re cooked here
We simply won’t score enough. Struggle to get above 50
(08-13-2013, 08:41 PM)PassIt2Carrots link Wrote:Tex, LLS, CIMM, Lods, GTC, Cookie and whoever else's opinion I doubted I apologise, you guys were right all along.
(09-07-2024, 08:35 AM)madbluboy link Wrote:TDK sub

Any hope we had of winning this match, just went out the window before the first bounce.

Only thing worse than playing 2 rucks when you have a full compliment of KPPs in the team
Is playing a ruck as a sub.....regardless of what you have on the ground at the time.
Not sure I can work that out? If he's fit, he plays?

So, who's the tall forward option when Harry rucks for short periods?

It might've worked against WCE and Saints, but hard to see us manufacturing enough goals. And if Neale gets off the chain, we'll be scratching our heads and asking the question about why Cincotta wasn't in the team to try to tag him.
A late change coming?

We have our arch enemy umpiring, Nafan (22 Figjam) Williamson, always finds a way to stitch us up!
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"
We the first ever to use a ruck as a sub.

Wonder if that means, bar injury, we plan to sub Pitto half way through the 3rd qtr. Other than that, I'm am baffled. I like a runner as sub to give us run with fresh legs.
(09-07-2024, 08:46 AM)laj link Wrote:We the first ever to use a ruck as a sub.

Wonder if that means, bar injury, we plan to sub Pitto half way through the 3rd qtr. Other than that, I'm am baffled. I like a runner as sub to give us run with fresh legs.

I think a few clubs tried it in the first couple games the sub rule came in.
Didn't last long because it doesn't work.
(09-07-2024, 08:44 AM)WASurfer link Wrote:Not sure I can work that out? If he's fit, he plays?

So, who's the tall forward option when Harry rucks for short periods?

It might've worked against WCE and Saints, but hard to see us manufacturing enough goals. And if Neale gets off the chain, we'll be scratching our heads and asking the question about why Cincotta wasn't in the team to try to tag him.

Harry and Kemp with Kennedy 3rd option.

I would like to think that there is a late change where this all makes sense.
But not sure.
It's a roll the dice game. Death or glory stuff. We're taking risks. A few of them I suspect.
There would have been considerable thought about the fitness of these guys. Some it was deemed weren't worth the risk. Others it was probably considered that their 80% offered a but more than a youngsters 100%.
While they may not make sense to us  the selectors have a lot more information than we have.
It may not come off, but it's arguably the best side we can present given all the info.


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)