Posts: 12,204
Threads: 37
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
Crouch was intent on cleaning up Carroll then winning the ball. He had the benefit of seeing Carroll going in, as he arrived later, and Carroll wouldnt have known that hit was coming, that being said, if players are not being trained to see that coming, thats on the people instructing them. Not sure that Carroll ducked into it.
"everything you know is wrong"
Paul Hewson
Posts: 16,688
Threads: 248
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
(04-17-2024, 11:47 PM)madbluboy link Wrote:We have to condition ourselves to there being less contact in the sport. Crouch didn't have to do that.
That's the way Crouch was taught to go for a ground ball. If Carroll had learnt the same technique, there would have been no head contact.
I agree that the game has to evolve to minimise head knocks but part of that evolution is a return to good technique and the elimination of foolhardy play encouraged by the rules as they are interpreted now. If two players went for the ball as Carroll did, it would have resulted in a head clash.
“Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don’t you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don’t you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?” Oddball
Posts: 10,710
Threads: 117
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
In fairness to Carroll he wasn't afforded the luxury of the run up Crouch had.
If you look at the slow mo replay Carroll actually was turning his body as he went to pick the ball up before he was smashed.
2012 HAPPENED!!!!!!!
Posts: 2,342
Threads: 2
Joined: Apr 2016
Reputation:
0
Bot isn't AFL ready and not sure whether he will ever be.