Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
AFL Rd 9 2023 Pre Game Prognostications Carlton vs Western Bulldogs
#91
(05-10-2023, 09:41 AM)Baggers date Wrote:I don't think Newey gave up the chase on Cameron, I think he gave up in disgust at how easy it got to Cameron and how little support there was for him and how little pressure up the field there was to create the Cameron opportunity in the first place.
But that didn't stop the media making an example of Newman.

My point to Carlton fans is don't listen to the media about Newman, and do not ignore the very same or worst act from Motlop or Durdin, those two SFs actually have the pace to catch someone over as short distance! The missing effort is the difference for those SFs to go from a goal a game to closer to 2 goals a game, it is the difference between a pass mark and actually being influential.
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"
Reply
#92
Interesting to compare the season averages:

Owies - 2 goals and 1.3 tackles with 0.3 tackles inside 50
Durdin - 1.3 goals and 4.1 tackles with 1.6 tackles inside 50
Motlop - 1.1 goals and 3.3 tackles with 1.7 tackles inside 50
Charlie Cameron - 3.2 goals and 3.5 tackles with 2.1 tackles inside 50

If Charlie's the benchmark, Durdin and Motlop aren't too far off the pace defensively but their scoreboard impact is way down.  The Doggies' defenders won't be having nightmares about our small forwards.

“Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don’t you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don’t you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?”  Oddball
Reply
#93
(05-10-2023, 01:18 PM)Macca37 link Wrote:My thoughts exactly.  In our desperation to strengthen our forward line we seem to have unreal expectations of what Owies can provide.
In the teams above us he would be lucky to get a game.
He does very regularly hit the scoreboard, alot more than other small forwards we've had.. He'd get a game in other sides. Probably play better not being at Carlton....lol. He's underrated.
Reply
#94
(05-11-2023, 03:01 AM)DJC link Wrote:Interesting to compare the season averages:

Owies - 2 goals and 1.3 tackles with 0.3 tackles inside 50
Durdin - 1.3 goals and 4.1 tackles with 1.6 tackles inside 50
Motlop - 1.1 goals and 3.3 tackles with 1.7 tackles inside 50
Charlie Cameron - 3.2 goals and 3.5 tackles with 2.1 tackles inside 50

If Charlie's the benchmark, Durdin and Motlop aren't too far off the pace defensively but their scoreboard impact is way down.  The Doggies' defenders won't be having nightmares about our small forwards.

2 goals a game, which would be 46 goals if theoretically pushed out to 23 games. Nice!!! Only a 3 game sample though although subbed off in one.

Actually it is 1.3 tackles a game this year, which included a subbed off game, and a 3.2 tackles over his career.
Reply
#95
The debate over the small forwards is a bit odd. No one is claiming Owies will win a Brownlow or get into the AA team. And sure, our small forwards as a group aren’t currently the envy of other sides. But you work with what you’ve got. The last offseason saw us prioritising wingers even though I thought we needed to find a crumbing goalsneak and a quick midfielder to add pace to the midfield. But you can’t fill all the holes in one offseason.

It used to be that the best crumbing smalls were found in the bargain basement. Eddie Betts, Stephen Milne and Tom Papley all came through the rookie draft (and remember we almost nabbed Papley in the manoeuvrings surrounding Joe Daniher). These days, the best goalsneaks are drafted early: Rankine (pick 3), Rachele (pick 5) and Pickett (pick 12). The best small forward in the coming draft, Nick Watson, is predicted to be a top 5 pick (despite being only 168-170cm and a bit of a flog). So you can’t just go down to the corner milk bar and buy a genuine goal kicking small anymore (to use a Paganism).

So we have to make do with what we have for the foreseeable future. Playing Motlop, Durdin and Owies together enables them to complement each others’ strengths. Durdin is the fast guy who’s best at snaps. Motlop is the best footballer although not blessed with great pace. And Owies seems to be the hardest running of the lot which enables him to run deep into F50 after running up the ground. He’s also a good mark and set shot, though I don’t see him as a great snap at goals.
Reply
#96
(05-11-2023, 03:45 AM)Mav link Wrote:The debate over the small forwards is a bit odd. No one is claiming Owies will win a Brownlow or get into the AA team. And sure, our small forwards as a group aren’t currently the envy of other sides. But you work with what you’ve got. The last offseason saw us prioritising wingers even though I thought we needed to find a crumbing goalsneak and a quick midfielder to add pace to the midfield. But you can’t fill all the holes in one offseason.

It used to be that the best crumbing smalls were found in the bargain basement. Eddie Betts, Stephen Milne and Tom Papley all came through the rookie draft (and remember we almost nabbed Papley in the manoeuvrings surrounding Joe Daniher). These days, the best goalsneaks are drafted early: Rankine (pick 3), Rachele (pick 5) and Pickett (pick 12). The best small forward in the coming draft, Nick Watson, is predicted to be a top 5 pick (despite being only 168-170cm and a bit of a flog). So you can’t just go down to the corner milk bar and buy a genuine goal kicking small anymore (to use a Paganism).

So we have to make do with what we have for the foreseeable future. Playing Motlop, Durdin and Owies together enables them to complement each others’ strengths. Durdin is the fast guy who’s best at snaps. Motlop is the best footballer although not blessed with great pace. And Owies seems to be the hardest running of the lot which enables him to run deep into F50 after running up the ground. He’s also a good mark and set shot, though I don’t see him as a great snap at goals.
No we dont, we need to improve on what we have and what we have is an inferior C grade set up that lacks at least one A grade small forward. No one expects three champions either but at the moment if Charlie and Harry dont hit the scoreboard then it is pretty much game over for us given our small forwards and mids give us very few goals.
This is what List Managers get paid to do and if Austin cant do it then he needs to be moved on........
Geelong got Stengle for nothing because they took a calculated gamble and then resourced that area to coach and settle the kid.
We over did the wingers imo last season and should have looked at smaller forwards, the other area we lack is that mid size 188-190cm marking forward like Fritsch from Melbourne, StKilda now have one in Philipou and Geelong of course have had Rohan to compliment their two big forwards for years now.
Reply
#97
But unless we can and do take someone in the mid season draft, we do have to make do with what we’ve got until this season is over. And we should only bring in another small forward by trade or in the draft if he’s clearly better than what we’ve got. We don’t want to recycle delisted players in the hope we can find a diamond in the rough (spoiler alert: our development of players is hardly elite). If there’s a good small forward who’ll be out of contract at the end of the year, maybe we could do what we did with Acres as we can certainly promise that there will be a spot in the seniors. The only problem with that is that maybe TdK ends up as a delisted free agent but we lose the considerable compensation we’d receive (as happened when Eddie left and we picked up Daisy).
Reply
#98
Mav....not sure we have a pick currently in the mid-season draft? We'd have to get a long term injury before the cut-off or indefinitely rule out one of the already injured blokes....Williams has already been put on that list. Maybe get Cunningham or Marchbank to belt out a few laps and I'm sure one of them will go down again.
Reply
#99
(05-11-2023, 07:30 AM)Mav link Wrote:But unless we can and do take someone in the mid season draft, we do have to make do with what we’ve got until this season is over. And we should only bring in another small forward by trade or in the draft if he’s clearly better than what we’ve got. We don’t want to recycle delisted players in the hope we can find a diamond in the rough (spoiler alert: our development of players is hardly elite). If there’s a good small forward who’ll be out of contract at the end of the year, maybe we could do what we did with Acres as we can certainly promise that there will be a spot in the seniors. The only problem with that is that maybe TdK ends up as a delisted free agent but we lose the considerable compensation we’d receive (as happened when Eddie left and we picked up Daisy).
Not sure who is available in the mid season draft but its really only a choice from the State Leagues so unless there is a standout performer its very speculative. TDk's value needs to be maximised for sure, according to Cook we are hitting the draft so any future trades will also have to be of the Acres moneyball variety which limits choices.
Reply
(05-11-2023, 08:01 AM)WASurfer link Wrote:Mav....not sure we have a pick currently in the mid-season draft? We'd have to get a long term injury before the cut-off or indefinitely rule out one of the already injured blokes....Williams has already been put on that list. Maybe get Cunningham or Marchbank to belt out a few laps and I'm sure one of them will go down again.
If we can, put both on "gardening leave", tell them they are done with us, put them on the LTI and get in replacements that are able to walk to the fridge and take out the bins out without getting hurt. Nuffs enuff FFS.
2017-16th
2018-Wooden Spoon
2019-16th
2020-dare to dream? 11th is better than last I suppose
2021-Pi$$ or get off the pot
2022- Real Deal or more of the same? 0.6%
2023- "Raise the Standard" - M. Voss Another year wasted Bar Set
2024-Back to the drawing boardNo excuses, its time
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)