Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Football Department Review
(08-18-2021, 10:41 PM)Gointocarlton date Wrote:What we do know is:
- Our footy dept is being reviewed
Didn't they announced a review of the whole club, but it doesn't seem to be playing out that way!

For me it's a Clayton's Review, they had an objective, they wanted a very specific outcome, and they made sure that is what it delivers!

I'm wondering if this review was any more than just an audition for Geoff Walsh, while at the same time offering some cover for Sayer's preferred list of changes?
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"
Reply
(08-19-2021, 12:32 AM)LP link Wrote:Didn't they announced a review of the whole club, but it doesn't seem to be playing out that way!

For me it's a Clayton's Review, they had an objective, they wanted a very specific outcome, and they made sure that is what it delivers!

I'm wondering if this review was any more than just an audition for Geoff Walsh, while at the same time offering some cover for Sayer's preferred list of changes?
For me, for once the club was clear in that it was stated to be a review of the whole footy dept. That is, everyone from Judd down to the boot studder.
2017-16th
2018-Wooden Spoon
2019-16th
2020-dare to dream? 11th is better than last I suppose
2021-Pi$$ or get off the pot
2022- Real Deal or more of the same? 0.6%
2023- "Raise the Standard" - M. Voss Another year wasted Bar Set
2024-Back to the drawing boardNo excuses, its time
Reply
(08-19-2021, 12:32 AM)LP link Wrote:Didn't they announced a review of the whole club, but it doesn't seem to be playing out that way!

For me it's a Clayton's Review, they had an objective, they wanted a very specific outcome, and they made sure that is what it delivers!

I'm wondering if this review was any more than just an audition for Geoff Walsh, while at the same time offering some cover for Sayer's preferred list of changes?
Its been denied that Walsh is being courted for any football admin role......however I remain skeptical given how quickly people change their minds in the world of AFL.
Reply
(08-19-2021, 01:36 AM)ElwoodBlues1 link Wrote:Its been denied that Walsh is being courted for any football admin role......however I remain skeptical given how quickly people change their minds in the world of AFL.

It would appear slightly unethical to be employed to review an organisation and thus find that the best way forward is to employ yourself full time...

But thats just me.
Let’s go BIG !
Reply
https://www.afl.com.au/news/666643/unles...ear-teague

Well worth a read, but it's a little depressing tbh.

Reply
(08-19-2021, 01:47 AM)PaulP link Wrote:https://www.afl.com.au/news/666643/unles...ear-teague

Well worth a read, but it's a little depressing tbh.
Abit mischievous by Beveridge IMO.
2017-16th
2018-Wooden Spoon
2019-16th
2020-dare to dream? 11th is better than last I suppose
2021-Pi$$ or get off the pot
2022- Real Deal or more of the same? 0.6%
2023- "Raise the Standard" - M. Voss Another year wasted Bar Set
2024-Back to the drawing boardNo excuses, its time
Reply
(08-19-2021, 01:47 AM)PaulP link Wrote:https://www.afl.com.au/news/666643/unles...ear-teague

Well worth a read, but it's a little depressing tbh.

Bit mischievous in the wordings from the journo - saying the review findings had been presented to the board.  Haven’t the board come out and said the review isn’t finished.  Yeah, they prob should keep Teague updated, but the article makes it sound like they have the results and they are keeping them from Teague
Reply
(08-19-2021, 02:01 AM)Gointocarlton link Wrote:Abit mischievous by Beveridge IMO.

Ha! Hadn’t read ur response when I typed mine.  Great minds!!!!
Reply
(08-19-2021, 02:01 AM)Gointocarlton link Wrote:Abit mischievous by Beveridge IMO.

Maybe, but I think Lyon is acting unethically, saying that he has "famous" Carlton people in his corner, and then talking about how Clarkson is the red hot favourite.  And the reason why the club hasn't backed Teague publicly is obvious. It's been a pretty grubby process, and all concerned should hang their heads in shame. There's no honour among thieves or senior coaches, it seems.
Reply
(08-19-2021, 02:04 AM)Milhanna13 link Wrote:Bit mischievous in the wordings from the journo - saying the review findings had been presented to the board.  Haven’t the board come out and said the review isn’t finished.  Yeah, they prob should keep Teague updated, but the article makes it sound like they have the results and they are keeping them from Teague
Agree Mil, Ill also add that Teagues comments come across as a bit naive if I'm honest. They said they wouldnt be providing running commentry and they havent. So how can he expect them to come out and say things about it? Also, he would have known, being an insider, the review was ongoing and not complete. How could he expect them to go up to him and say "you'll be right mate" when the review wasnt complete. Perhaps its me thats naive.
2017-16th
2018-Wooden Spoon
2019-16th
2020-dare to dream? 11th is better than last I suppose
2021-Pi$$ or get off the pot
2022- Real Deal or more of the same? 0.6%
2023- "Raise the Standard" - M. Voss Another year wasted Bar Set
2024-Back to the drawing boardNo excuses, its time
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)