Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Image of a Black Hole
#11
(04-12-2019, 12:39 AM)flyboy77 link Wrote:It's still CGI.

Do you mean CGI in the literal sense of a "Computer Generated Image"?

A computer may display the data as a digital image but a computer did not generate the digital image, that is the key difference as far as I can tell! I realise it's a bit of a pedantic lexical ambiguity but that is just a problem of language.

If you were discussing an image produced by the earlier simulations, then CGI would be a correct way to describe it as the image is generated by the computer simulation. But the image is displayed is measurement data displayed as an image, the computer doesn't really generate the data it just displays it.

Another real achievement of this process is that the measurements confirm the accuracy of the simulations, those simulations are like a prediction based in maths and physics, somebody preemptively thought about it and got it right! The models/simulations take into account how stuff like Dark Energy and Dark Matter should work/interact but not what they are, 85% of the universe we cannot see but we indirectly detect, the real imaging and measurement matching the earlier simulation is a big deal for the reason it confirms we know how these things might interact on the large scale, and even if we do not know what they are we can still detect them! Smart Cookie, was it ours?
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"
Reply
#12
More like computer processed image than computer generated image.
DrE is no more... you ok with that harmonica man?
Reply
#13
(04-12-2019, 11:47 AM)Professer E link Wrote:More like computer processed image than computer generated image.

Yes, one is based on data, the other on imagination.
“Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don’t you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don’t you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?”  Oddball
Reply
#14
Either way, it's still amazing and gives us specs of dust an insight into far off phenomena.

From 'seeing' far off worlds to teaching certain proteins to attack certain cancers in our bodies (rather than chemo) there certainly are some incredible things being discovered at present.

Only our ruthless best, from Board to bootstudders will get us no. 17
Reply
#15
(04-12-2019, 12:39 AM)flyboy77 link Wrote:It's still CGI.

If you type numbers into a calculator, did the calculator work out how to spit out the answer to you?
No, someone has programmed that calculator to take that input and give you the answer you want.
It follows strict guidelines on how to proceed with the information.

Same with this.

We've given all the data required to the computer and have programmed it to work out the answer (in this case a picture) for us.
Reply
#16
(04-12-2019, 11:31 PM)kruddler link Wrote:If you type numbers into a calculator, did the calculator work out how to spit out the answer to you?
No, someone has programmed that calculator to take that input and give you the answer you want.
It follows strict guidelines on how to proceed with the information.

Same with this.

We've given all the data required to the computer and have programmed it to work out the answer (in this case a picture) for us.

What a crock....
Finals, then 4 in a row!
Reply
#17
I don't need technology to see a Black Hole. One look at our once mighty club shows that.
Live Long and Prosper!
Reply
#18
PaulP current avatar.
"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson
Reply
#19
(04-14-2019, 07:47 AM)Thryleon link Wrote:PaulP current avatar.

Yep. It will get progressively lighter as we move up the ladder. Could be black for a while.
Reply
#20
There was a black hole on tne Gold Coaxt today that is swallowing Carlton
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)