Posts: 12,204
Threads: 37
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
Collingwood and geelong fumbling a bit too.
Looks like its contagious.
Ditto kicking for goal.
"everything you know is wrong"
Paul Hewson
Posts: 18,852
Threads: 274
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
(03-22-2019, 11:38 AM)Shakin77 link Wrote:I would be careful quoting DE% numbers
Martin 63.3
Cotchin 51.6
Walsh 54.2
De Goey 50
Treloar 61.8
Selwood 52
Dangerfield 59.3
Dahlhaus 66.7
T.Kelly 67.7
Defenders chips it around and have good numbers. Midfielders often bringing the ball inside 50 to a out number.
Point taken re DE, the rest of what I stated is still my opinion. As EB stated, he picks and chooses when to go, I'd play him in the VFL for a very long stint.
2017-16th
2018-Wooden Spoon
2019-16th
2020-dare to dream? 11th is better than last I suppose
2021-Pi$$ or get off the pot
2022- Real Deal or more of the same? 0.6%
2023- "Raise the Standard" - M. Voss Another year wasted Bar Set
2024-Back to the drawing boardNo excuses, its time
Posts: 1,034
Threads: 3
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
Richmond have an established team that runs out games very well. We have a new team (some huge number of players weren't in the r23 side of last year).
There were a couple of quarters of intent, teamwork and moving the ball quickly. Hopefully we start playing in the first quarter soon.
Does the no runner rule affect us more as we are establishing how we play and players need a few more reminders of what they should be doing v Richmond's established plan where everyone is well practised at it?
Posts: 18,852
Threads: 274
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
(03-22-2019, 03:49 PM)spf link Wrote:I actually do like him, but I wonder if we wouldn't be better off trading him to Fremantle for Adam Cera. I would hate for him to have a purple patch then want to go home.
Again I am no expert but I'd do that in a heartbeat.
2017-16th
2018-Wooden Spoon
2019-16th
2020-dare to dream? 11th is better than last I suppose
2021-Pi$$ or get off the pot
2022- Real Deal or more of the same? 0.6%
2023- "Raise the Standard" - M. Voss Another year wasted Bar Set
2024-Back to the drawing boardNo excuses, its time
Posts: 2,478
Threads: 21
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
(03-22-2019, 09:42 PM)dodge link Wrote:Richmond have an established team that runs out games very well. We have a new team (some huge number of players weren't in the r23 side of last year).
There were a couple of quarters of intent, teamwork and moving the ball quickly. Hopefully we start playing in the first quarter soon.
Does the no runner rule affect us more as we are establishing how we play and players need a few more reminders of what they should be doing v Richmond's established plan where everyone is well practised at it?
The cynic in me says yes the Runner not being able to get onto the field more will hurt young teams. That is why the rule was introduced.
They do whatever they can to keep us down.
I think I have become a bitter old man.
2024... Moir of the same to come
Posts: 1,171
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2013
Reputation:
0
03-23-2019, 04:07 AM
(This post was last modified: 03-23-2019, 06:39 AM by Barbs.)
Having now watched the full replay I’ll offer some thoughts.
It was almost like watching a different team at times. Q1 and Q4 was like watching 18 individuals run out on the ground and watch the game unfold with minimal effort, no run and no teamwork. Q2 and Q3 the same players worked, ran hard together and tackled with intensity.
When we stopped running we resorted to predictable play that the tigers picked up easily. And it was the same tactic that killed us last year - get a mark, stop, take time, quick long down the line. No run and carry at all in the bad quarters. Richmond just put more players at the drop of the ball and knocked it around until their numbers won out.
Defensively, I’m begging you Bolts - abandon our zone. Players guarding space doesn’t work for us. Our midfield don’t play defensively enough and the lack of pressure exposes the backline who stand off their opponents too much. We might grow to suit the zone as we improve but for now we absolutely must drop an extra man back for most of the game to stop the easy forward movement by the opposition.
The irony of our forward line is that our tall players look quick, are mobile and cover the ground but our small forwards look strong but move slow. Ed is not a small forward. He lacks the speed to chase and isn’t creative enough to seize the moment and play on. Perhaps we could try swapping him and Garlett?
I thought Charlie was below his best, but he was apparently among our players covering the most ground. So he’s working hard but being ineffective. Hopefully gets back into form after this one.
Finally, we’ll done Walsh. A good showing from the lad in his first game.