Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Best team.....and next best
#1
OK, so i got bored waiting for stuff to happen, so i did this exercise most have done plenty of times before.

Pick your best team.

....and pick your next best team....your 2nds.

Now we still have a few spots on our list, so i limited it to 18 each, which also allows you to fill your bench with the best of the second lot.
FWIW, I didn't include any rookies (well, not good enough anyway) and i didn't include Byrne because....well he's barely a Carlton player at this point in time.

I think everyone else fits in there nicely....even with the 2 new additions McGovern and Fasolo.

Yes, Walsh and Setterfield are likely too, but we'll wait for that to through first Wink

FB Marchbank Weitering Plowman
J. Silvagni Jones Williamson


HB Docherty Rowe Simpson
Lamb Macreadie Cuningham


C E. Curnow Cripps Petrevski-Seton
Kerridge Kennedy Polson


HF McGovern C. Curnow Fisher
Kerr Casboult Garlett


FF Fasolo H. McKay Thomas
Lang DeKoning Pickett


R Kreuzer Dow Murphy
Phillips/Lobbe O'Brien Graham

What have i got wrong? What would you do different??
Reply
#2
Differently?  Nuthin'  Good team Smile
Reply
#3
Oops. I forgot Schumacher....not that he'd really push anyone out of the firsts.....or even seconds really.
Reply
#4
(10-10-2018, 08:22 AM)kruddler link Wrote:Oops. I forgot Schumacher....not that he'd really push anyone out of the firsts.....or even seconds really.

Looks good but keep your powder dry, trade period aint done yet. Still hoping we will grab a Barlow type for grunt work in the guts for a year or two to help the younger blokes. Ps I'd have Murphy as a small forward with Fasolo (super headache for opposing coaches/assuming that Pickett and Garlett continue to be ...not much) and Fisher as an on-baller.
Only our ruthless best, from Board to bootstudders will get us no. 17
Reply
#5
I think I read somewhere MM likely to be playing more as a back.
Cant remember where I saw it though, so maybe BS.
Reply
#6
(10-10-2018, 08:32 AM)deags link Wrote:I think I read somewhere MM likely to be playing more as a back.
Cant remember where I saw it though, so maybe BS.

i f***n hope not. We have an abundance of backs already, Unless we are planning on trading one (some?) away, i'd play him forward.
Reply
#7
(10-10-2018, 08:34 AM)kruddler link Wrote:i f***n hope not. We have an abundance of backs already, Unless we are planning on trading one (some?) away, i'd play him forward.

x2..forward is where he does his best work..
Reply
#8
Our Firsts would give our Seconds a mother of a hiding Wink
Reply
#9
A fit Williamson plays firsts
Reply
#10
Ditto Pickett and Kennedy
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)