Post Game-Carlton v Collingwood

[madbluboy]

Fantasy point?

Crippa 146
Pendles 101

Nuff said indeed!

Cripps got 187 Supercoach.

[LP]

Cripps got 187 Supercoach.

If Cripps could keep his DE up to 80%, equivalent to yesterday's game, he would probably average that on SC.

He's had more football in other games, but his DE was in the mid to low 60s.

[Wet Willie]

I thought, after the game, that it was unusual to have 3-2-1 going to the side that lost by 20 points. 

I was wondering if the Pies were more even across their team...

Cripps, Simmo and Curnow were absolute standouts.

I also thought Collingwood looked spooked coming off after the half time push & shove.  Treloar could hardly get words out during a quick interview, looked very upset.  They were looking like "the hunted".

[pew2]

boys did well yesterday,BUT i would like to ask the coaches how do opposition sides get a open forward line or get a 1v1 match up ,yet charlie gets 2 def on him or our fwd line is always crowded .How does this happen everyweek?

[Raydan]

boys did well yesterday,BUT i would like to ask the coaches how do opposition sides get a open forward line or get a 1v1 match up ,yet charlie gets 2 def on him or our fwd line is always crowded .How does this happen everyweek?

Cause we play 7 in defence, which gives them an extra in their defence.

[LP]

I haven't seen a very clear angle of the Daisy bump, but from the two or three angles I've seen it looked like Daisy's shoulder hits Greenwood in the chest and their heads clash. Because Daisy doesn't fold like a pack of cards apparently he's a mongrel!

Also the jumper clash, there it is in the media today, the truth behind the spuddly left field out of the blue unscripted jumper clash question.

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/mcgu...4znl3.html

MadGuire has come out and stated there is too much of a clash between the traditional jumpers and he is going to act on the Collingwood jumper. Decoded, that probably means one of two things.

Firstly, and least likely, he is folding to the AFL's wishes and he commissioning a Collingwood clash jumper. Alternatively, despite saying that he wants Carlton to retain it's traditional jumper for away games against Collingwood, that is all just smokescreen because MadGuire knows the AFL will do his dirty work to get Carlton to change it's kit when we play away to the Pies!

[Vivian]

Concur with many of the posts. We are still undersized and lost the flow of the game often as players are out of position. Gartlett looked clueless, running in ever small circles, (did a nice tap through for a behind though) while oshae and mullet are part of the brigade that just make up the numbers.

Was the first game all season where we showed the type of ball movement we are aiming for. It has appears a few times, but it was implemented several times. Really encouraging and allows zones to be overcome.

Bad for plowman. Hopefully just a jarred knee without any longterm damage.

[Jofo]

I haven't seen a very clear angle of the Daisy bump, but from the two or three angles I've seen it looked like Daisy's shoulder hits Greenwood in the chest and their heads clash. Because Daisy doesn't fold like a pack of cards apparently he's a mongrel!

Also the jumper clash, there it is in the media today, the truth behind the spuddly left field out of the blue unscripted jumper clash question.

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/mcgu...4znl3.html

MadGuire has come out and stated there is too much of a clash between the traditional jumpers and he is going to act on the Collingwood jumper. Decoded, that probably means one of two things.

Firstly, and least likely, he is folding to the AFL's wishes and he commissioning a Collingwood clash jumper. Alternatively, despite saying that he wants Carlton to retain it's traditional jumper for away games against Collingwood, that is all just smokescreen because MadGuire knows the AFL will do his dirty work to get Carlton to change it's kit when we play away to the Pies!

A white back instead of black will solve the issue.

[LP]

A white back instead of black will solve the issue.

What issue, it's imaginary!

Difference wise there is already a some stripes versus a solid colour, white and black shorts, the CGU logo.

[img width=350]https://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/3923549fcac47ee22f674a2b357bddbe[/img]

Perhaps one team can wear flashing lights on their head to make sure the nerds can tell them apart! :

FFS, this was never an issue in the days or black and white, low definition analogue TV. Now that we can see a blackhead on some players face in full HD the jumpers have become a problem!

MadGuire doing this for a reason, he probably wants more marketing space and is too petrified to tell the toothless hoard they need to buy an alternate jumper!

[Jofo]

What issue, it's imaginary!

Difference wise there is already a some stripes versus a solid colour, white and black shorts, the CGU logo.

[img width=350]https://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/3923549fcac47ee22f674a2b357bddbe[/img]

Perhaps one team can wear flashing lights on their head to make sure the nerds can tell them apart! :

FFS, this was never an issue in the days or black and white, low definition analogue TV. Now that we can see a blackhead on some players face in full HD the jumpers have become a problem!

MadGuire doing this for a reason, he probably wants more marketing space and is too petrified to tell the toothless hoard they need to buy an alternate jumper!

Collingwood used to have predominantly white backs on their jumpers and there was no sponsors on the back. Sponsors logos stand out better on dark backgrounds, hence the introduction of the black backs. I think also, Collingwood wanted to make sure that Port Adelaide was never going to be able to wear their traditional jumper which had a black back.
Also play was far less congested and there were a lot of one on one contests in the olden days. Nowadays, when you're at the ground, it is really difficult to pick up the players sometimes, particularly from a distance, on dull days or in fading light.