Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2018 Rd 10: Post Game Insanity: Carlton vs Geelong
#81
This is the by-line that I saw - "Geelong's Sam Menegola has been directed straight to the tribunal for his incident with Carlton's Sam Rowe."  The article got the reporting right, however.

It certainly looked bad on the night - I had a quick look to find footage, but couldn't find any.  Be interested to see what we all missed on the night (Rowe holding arm, Shin making contact with Rowe's back etc)

Can we appeal it?

Reply
#82
(05-28-2018, 06:57 AM)dodge link Wrote:This is the by-line that I saw - "Geelong's Sam Menegola has been directed straight to the tribunal for his incident with Carlton's Sam Rowe."  The article got the reporting right, however.

It certainly looked bad on the night - I had a quick look to find footage, but couldn't find any.  Be interested to see what we all missed on the night (Rowe holding arm, Shin making contact with Rowe's back etc)

Can we appeal it?

I think clubs tend to appeal only to get their own player off a suspension. There isn't (at least IMO), any practical benefit to us if Menegola gets rubbed out next week, the following week etc.

Fans not happy :

https://au.sports.yahoo.com/footy-fans-s...10287.html
Reply
#83
I don't usually get too involved in these MRP decisions, but that one is simply poor, anti Carlton bias or not.

Christian is either having real teething issues, or he is simply not up to the task.
Reply
#84
(05-28-2018, 07:13 AM)PaulP link Wrote:I don't usually get too involved in these MRP decisions, but that one is simply poor, anti Carlton bias or not.

Christian is either having real teething issues, or he is simply not up to the task.

Christian has never really impressed me - always thought he was a d/h on Ch10.
Reality always wins in the end.
Reply
#85
Rowey got straight up - insufficient force. Never mind bringing the game into disrepute with a bloke kneeing and kicking (in the head) a pinned/prostrate opponent.
Only our ruthless best, from Board to bootstudders will get us no. 17
Reply
#86
(05-28-2018, 07:15 AM)cookie2 link Wrote:Christian has never really impressed me - always thought he was a d/h on Ch10.

He is a dill, but the function should not sit with one person  who thinks it is sensible to comment via media. AFL thinks it can solve all issues via media management.
Reply
#87
(05-28-2018, 07:34 AM)Baggers link Wrote:Rowey got straight up - insufficient force. Never mind bringing the game into disrepute with a bloke kneeing and kicking (in the head) a pinned/prostrate opponent.

If the AFL can suspend people for touching an umpire in such a manner that they are not threatened by it, remember it or even feel it because it looks bad for the game and they don't want the kiddies to emulate it....fair enough.

But then a week later, don't let someone off for ramming someone elses head into the ground and kicking him in the back of the head and say its insufficient force. What, the kiddies are going to try and emulate that? Or is it OK if they wanna kick someone in the back of the head?

Be consistent!
Reply
#88
(05-28-2018, 08:18 AM)kruddler link Wrote:If the AFL can suspend people for touching an umpire in such a manner that they are not threatened by it, remember it or even feel it because it looks bad for the game and they don't want the kiddies to emulate it....fair enough.

But then a week later, don't let someone off for ramming someone elses head into the ground and kicking him in the back of the head and say its insufficient force. What, the kiddies are going to try and emulate that? Or is it OK if they wanna kick someone in the back of the head?

Be consistent!

Smile) Smile) Smile) good one, Kruds. You could make money out of humour like that... ;D ;D
Only our ruthless best, from Board to bootstudders will get us no. 17
Reply
#89
Interesting coaches votes this week....
GEELONG v CARLTON
8 Patrick Cripps (Carl)
8 Tom Stewart (Geel)
5 Mitch Duncan (Geel)
3 Patrick Dangerfield (Geel)
2 Jack Henry (Geel)
2 Lachie Plowman (Carl)
1 Ed Curnow (Carl)
1 Kade Simpson (Carl)

By deduction its clear that 1 coach gave Mitch Duncan BOG and the other coach didn't think he was worthy of a vote.
???
Reply
#90
(05-28-2018, 09:35 AM)kruddler link Wrote:Interesting coaches votes this week....
GEELONG v CARLTON
8 Patrick Cripps (Carl)
8 Tom Stewart (Geel)
5 Mitch Duncan (Geel)
3 Patrick Dangerfield (Geel)
2 Jack Henry (Geel)
2 Lachie Plowman (Carl)
1 Ed Curnow (Carl)
1 Kade Simpson (Carl)

By deduction its clear that 1 coach gave Mitch Duncan BOG and the other coach didn't think he was worthy of a vote.
???
27 Possies at 85% DE is a fair nights work IMO, he would have been my best player after Cripps/Stewart........one coach has no idea IMO....
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)