Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
AFLPA Awards 2017
#1
Matty Kreuzer, Marc Murphy and Sam Docherty have been nominated by the playing group for the AFLPA Most Valuable Player award.

Kreuzer has also been nominated for the Most Courageous award and Samo Ptrevski-Seton is in the running for Best First Year Player.

There are no surprises there but I'm sure that some CSCers are shaking their head at the notion of the playing group considering Murphy to be worthy of MVP status  Wink
“Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don’t you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don’t you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?”  Oddball
Reply
#2
(09-05-2017, 09:31 PM)DJC link Wrote:There are no surprises there but I'm sure that some CSCers are shaking their head at the notion of the playing group considering Murphy to be worthy of MVP status  Wink

It's a bit of an indictment on our supporters that they can't or won't see his true worth.
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"
Reply
#3
I agree with those 3 nominations and have thought for most of the year Murphy will win our B&F.
Kreuzer had an excellent 2nd half (with a very good 1st half) and might just end up getting him, but I will be stunned if he is top 2, let alone top 3
Goals for 2017
=============
Play the most anti-social football in the AFL

[Image: blueline.jpg]
Reply
#4
Those three have been outstanding for us this year, I'm proud of them as CFC players.
Reality always wins in the end.
Reply
#5
(09-05-2017, 09:31 PM)DJC link Wrote:Matty Kreuzer, Marc Murphy and Sam Docherty have been nominated by the playing group for the AFLPA Most Valuable Player award.

Kreuzer has also been nominated for the Most Courageous award and Samo Ptrevski-Seton is in the running for Best First Year Player.

There are no surprises there but I'm sure that some CSCers are shaking their head at the notion of the playing group considering Murphy to be worthy of MVP status  Wink

Well he didn't make the AA squad so no one outside of Carlton rates him.
2012 HAPPENED!!!!!!!
Reply
#6
(09-06-2017, 01:17 AM)madbluboy link Wrote:Well he didn't make the AA squad so no one outside of Carlton rates him.

Neither did Kreuzer, despite having superior numbers to all his competitors, which says more about the selection committee than the players.

Just a Reminder HERE of Kreuzers effectiveness versus other rucks or mid-fielders.
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"
Reply
#7
(09-06-2017, 01:25 AM)LP link Wrote:Neither did Kreuzer, despite having superior numbers to all his competitors, which says more about the selection committee than the players.

Just a Reminder HERE of Kreuzers effectiveness versus other rucks or mid-fielders.

Kreuzer made the squad.
2012 HAPPENED!!!!!!!
Reply
#8
(09-06-2017, 01:17 AM)madbluboy link Wrote:Well he didn't make the AA squad so no one outside of Carlton rates him.

Nomination by your peers is always is always rated very highly. They'd know way more about how the captain performs than a supporter with a set against him.
Reply
#9
(09-06-2017, 01:31 AM)madbluboy link Wrote:Kreuzer made the squad.

Kreuzer made the shortlist, but was cut from the final team.
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"
Reply
#10
(09-06-2017, 01:17 AM)madbluboy link Wrote:Well he didn't make the AA squad so no one outside of Carlton rates him.

So absolutely said to rile people up.
About 15? Mids made the AA squad?
Not that many usually make it from the bottom couple obviously..

But as said at the start, your comment isn't even on you think is true (that if you are not in the AA top 40 no one rates you)
Goals for 2017
=============
Play the most anti-social football in the AFL

[Image: blueline.jpg]
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)