Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
ALFW B&F Thread
#11
3 Davey
2 Arnell
1 Vescio
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"
Reply
#12
3. Davey
2. Vescio
1. Jacobson

Vivian Kerr medal sounds good to me too.
I spent most of my money on Women and grog.
The rest I just wasted.
Reply
#13
(02-05-2017, 01:02 PM)Navy Maven link Wrote:A suggestion for the name, and even though she's a Bulldogs woman, she's the major reason that the women's comp even exists today, the Sue Alberti medal (at least for the first year until we have some Carlton women to name it after?? A lot mightn't know that Sue has been a major financial backer and vocal supporter of women's football for decades. She might have been the VP of the Western Bulldogs, but she's right behind all of the teams in the women's comp. She was at our game on Friday.

As for my votes:

3. Bri Davey
2. Darcy Vescio
1. Lauren Arnell

I cant vote as I only saw a half.

Sue Alberti can have their version of the Brownlow, rather than the CFC B+F.

Shes a doggies woman anyway.

It could be argued that the Jeannie Pratt medal would be good.

Without the Pratts there might not have been a Carlton Football Club for a womans team to represent.

I dont necessarily like that alternative either.
"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson
Reply
#14
My votes....

3. Brianna Davey
2. Bianca Jakobsson
1. Darcy Vescio
Reply
#15
(02-05-2017, 07:48 AM)DJC link Wrote:I'd prefer the same format as Jim Park ... but I don't tally the votes.

3 - Davey
2 - Jacobsson
1 - Vescio

Team: B+  Smile

As for the name of the award, how about someone from our last women's team?
I like the Jim Park format myself, as I do spread my votes around somewhat. But with the questions around of the long term interest, I was a little dubious about tasking people to make such a commitment. 15 votes is a commitment and we don't have that many people who vote for the Jim Park every week.
Assuming the interest continues, we may well head to that format.
As for tallying up the votes, I assumed I was doing it.
Live Long and Prosper!
Reply
#16
(02-06-2017, 12:27 AM)crashlander link Wrote:I like the Jim Park format myself, as I do spread my votes around somewhat. But with the questions around of the long term interest, I was a little dubious about tasking people to make such a commitment. 15 votes is a commitment and we don't have that many people who vote for the Jim Park every week.
Assuming the interest continues, we may well head to that format.
As for tallying up the votes, I assumed I was doing it.

So did I, and I didn't want to create more work for you ... unless you really want to do it  Smile

I think it's probably best to stick with 3,2,1 and re-evaluate at the end of the season. 
“Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don’t you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don’t you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?”  Oddball
Reply
#17
Between Navy Maven, myself and crash we'll take care of the tallying (and double checking ;D) each week so keeping the format simple this year will mean it won't be too arduous. If we go to an extended format like the Jim Park next year one of the site members might like to take it on as a task.
Reply
#18
3 Davey
2 Vescio
1 Exon
Coming together is the beginning.
Keeping together is progress.
Working together is success.
Henry Ford.
Reply
#19
(02-06-2017, 01:06 AM)Lods link Wrote:Between Navy Maven, myself and crash we'll take care of the tallying (and double checking ;D) each week so keeping the format simple this year will mean it won't be too arduous. If we go to an extended format like the Jim Park next year one of the site members might like to take it on as a task.
No worries. Give me a shout if you need to.
Live Long and Prosper!
Reply
#20
What we'll do is keep the thread open until midnight Thursday then we'll lock it up and tally the votes for the week.

The highest vote winner gets the three, second highest the two and third highest the one.

A possible 24 votes over the eight weeks.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)