Posts: 12,204
Threads: 37
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
X3 Gorringe could be something, but isnt anything at the moment aside from a tall athletic player who struggles to get on the park consistently.
Jaksch looks like he has the tools to be a footballer. At the moment, we are doing ourselves no favours by not playing him. He got a game or two for Malthouse early on and looked up to the standard.
Gorringe doesnt even if he is more competitive in the contest.
"everything you know is wrong"
Paul Hewson
Posts: 8,686
Threads: 72
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
(08-07-2017, 08:52 AM)kruddler link Wrote:I'd prefer to keep Gorringe than Jaksch for the same reasons.
Why keep either? One's a glass man and the other is one-dimensional. Let them both go.
Only our ruthless best, from Board to bootstudders will get us no. 17
Posts: 9,435
Threads: 67
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
Pity about Jaksch, he clearly had/has all the talent in the world.... is there any hint of MH problems?
Finals, then 4 in a row!
Posts: 1,323
Threads: 8
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
(08-08-2017, 03:08 AM)flyboy77 link Wrote:Pity about Jaksch, he clearly had/has all the talent in the world.... is there any hint of MH problems?
No. Jaksch problem is he is not good enough to play AFL.
Pure and simple.
I spent most of my money on Women and grog.
The rest I just wasted.