Posts: 29,292
Threads: 289
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
(09-20-2015, 08:30 AM)ElwoodBlues1 link Wrote:Yep you are right :-[ but I still say Mick would have rubber stamped the outgoing players and tooka different approach than
when he was at Collingwood..
EB1 we still have a major problem with player development. It's my opinion we still have some rather ordinary coaches who possibly retain their job by potting players. That's also a culture killer!
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"
Posts: 13,062
Threads: 50
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
(09-20-2015, 10:05 AM)ElwoodBlues1 link Wrote:Mick wouldnt move core influential players ie ratpackers on who could help win him a flag......different at Carlton where the stakes were not as high and his bad boys Robbo, Garlett, Waite etc
were moved on...
Agree, MM stated clearly on several occasions that he was first and foremost concerned with winning games. OK he didn't actually achieve that too much of that with us, but that was his stated primary aim. If that was indeed the case, he would have just taken whatever action was necessary according to the circumstances he saw prevailing at the time, so we can't expect to find consistency - more likely expediency.
Reality always wins in the end.
Posts: 1,744
Threads: 19
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
I recall an ex player saying mm run carlton like a private school for boys....yes sir no sir three bag full sir...