Round 8 Preview - Carlton v Geelong

[laj]

How? To me it strengthens it.

Jones tries.
Watson doesn't.

Jones will run, present, chase and tackle.
Watson will stand there with his hand in the air.

Mick doesn't have too many options at present, but if given the choice between someone who puts in, and someone who doesn't...its an easy call!

This doesn't mean Jones is the answer to our issues, it just means that Watson isn't.

Right now you seem to get everything wrong. The biggest criticism of Jones is his lack of workrate. I laughed when you say that was his strength.  Even Barry Hall said that was a big problem when he was at the Dogs on one of the telecasts. Plus he's kicks as badly as Casboult right now.

Not a great choice but I'd still go with Watson of the two and that's not saying alot. Been better to bring Jaksch back in if they wanted a tall.

[Baggers]

Good interview with Jammo on SEN, sounds like a good assistant coach in the making.

[Thryleon]

Right now you seem to get everything wrong. The biggest criticism of Jones is his lack of workrate. I laughed when you say that was his strength.  Even Barry Hall said that was a big problem when he was at the Dogs on one of the telecasts. Plus he's kicks as badly as Casboult right now.

Not a great choice but I'd still go with Watson of the two and that's not saying alot. Been better to bring Jaksch back in if they wanted a tall.

are you really that narrow minded?

It didn't take much to get a game ahead of Watson.

We called it before the game.

You would get less out of Watson than you would Jones.

We are going in far too tall.  No wonder we lack run.

[kruddler]

Right now you seem to get everything wrong. The biggest criticism of Jones is his lack of workrate. I laughed when you say that was his strength.  Even Barry Hall said that was a big problem when he was at the Dogs on one of the telecasts. Plus he's kicks as badly as Casboult right now.

Not a great choice but I'd still go with Watson of the two and that's not saying alot. Been better to bring Jaksch back in if they wanted a tall.

If you ever agreed with me, i'd have to check myself in to the men in white coats.

The majority of the time you don't even read what i write. If you do you clearly don't understand it.
The rest of the time you are so narrow minded that even if Chris Judd told you otherwise, you wouldn't believe it.

Keep on trucking Jim the great.

[crazyjoedevolamk11]

Warnock in?????  You're f.....g kidding me  >

[Baggers]

When we start arguing about Jones V Watson, you know we're in trouble. I'm pretty sure when the SC chooses the side and has to decide between these two, it's all about the lesser of two evils.

2.8 out of 10 versus 2.9 out of 10.

[townsendcalling]

Warnock for Carrazzo.... officially taking the p1ss!!

[Baggers]

Probably, as PD posted, gives Meat the chance to be THE forward and not play ruck. Our selection would be hoping this gives the Pussy Cats a headache.

Our headache is our selection committee.

[bratblue]

Warnock for Carrots,,,like for like.

[madbluboy]

Foxfooty crew are laughing at us.