Posts: 20,141
Threads: 165
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
The only team selection strategy that makes sense is that you pick the 22 players that will give you the best chance of winning the game at hand. Everything else is folly.
Posts: 16,688
Threads: 248
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
(04-14-2015, 11:27 AM)kruddler link Wrote: You failing here is that you expect journos to make well-reasoned articles. They do not.
This kind of logic had me wondering if there was some logic to some of Micks bizarre words of late. Specifically in regards to potential contract talks.
Does Mick Malthouse of now, pick the same exact team that a Mick Malthouse with another year or 2 to go on his contract would? Does he play players that are in his best interests now or does he play players that are in the best interests for the club long term even if he is not here passed this year.
I think that is the 'big distraction' that a coaches contract talks present.
I think that it also plays a part in injury management/treatment. The inexplicable decision to take the 'conservative' approach with Daisy's shoulder for example.
“Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don’t you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don’t you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?” Oddball
Posts: 13,062
Threads: 50
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
0
(04-14-2015, 11:19 AM)PaulP link Wrote: The only team selection strategy that makes sense is that you pick the 22 players that will give you the best chance of winning the game at hand. Everything else is folly.
Which ones are they though Paul? - the $64million question. ???
Reality always wins in the end.