Poll: Pick your best 22 players (22 votes allowed!)
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
1 - Walker
4.38%
22 4.38%
2 - Menzel
3.59%
18 3.59%
3 - Murphy
4.58%
23 4.58%
4 - Gibbs
4.58%
23 4.58%
5 - Judd
1.00%
5 1.00%
6 - Simpson
4.38%
22 4.38%
7 - Buckley
4.58%
23 4.58%
8 - Kreuzer
4.58%
23 4.58%
9 - Cripps
4.58%
23 4.58%
10 - Watson
0%
0 0%
11 - Warnock
0%
0 0%
12 - Boekhorst
3.19%
16 3.19%
13 - Yarran
1.20%
6 1.20%
14 - Jones
0%
0 0%
15 - Docherty
4.38%
22 4.38%
16 - Viojo-Rainbow
0%
0 0%
17 - Rowe
2.99%
15 2.99%
18 - Jaksch
2.99%
15 2.99%
19 - Giles
0%
0 0%
20 - Holman
1.39%
7 1.39%
21 - Sheehan
0.80%
4 0.80%
22 - Tutt
0.20%
1 0.20%
23 - Henderson
0.60%
3 0.60%
24 - Whiley
0.60%
3 0.60%
25 - Smith
0%
0 0%
26 - Foster
0%
0 0%
27 - Armfield
3.78%
19 3.78%
28 - Bell
3.19%
16 3.19%
29 - Gowers
0%
0 0%
30 - Johnson
0%
0 0%
31 - Dick
0.20%
1 0.20%
32 - Graham
3.98%
20 3.98%
33 - Everitt
4.38%
22 4.38%
34 - Walsh
0.20%
1 0.20%
35 - Curnow
4.58%
23 4.58%
36 - Wood
2.39%
12 2.39%
37 - Fields
0%
0 0%
38 - Byrne
1.39%
7 1.39%
39 - Thomas
3.78%
19 3.78%
40 - Jamison
4.38%
22 4.38%
41 - Casboult
4.58%
23 4.58%
42 - Tuohy
4.58%
23 4.58%
43 - White
2.79%
14 2.79%
44 - Carrazzo
1.20%
6 1.20%
46 - Ellard
0%
0 0%
47 - Russell
0%
0 0%
Total 502 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Pick your best 22 players - Part 8 (Season over - wooden spooners)
#61
Walker isn't best 22 based on his past 2 seasons, neither is Thomas.  Menzel barely scrapes in.
DrE is no more... you ok with that harmonica man?
Reply
#62
Results are in....not many people voted during this time, but voters have remained relatively consistent.

Starters
3 - Murphy -    13 (4.5%)
4 - Gibbs -    13 (4.5%)
4 - Gibbs -    13 (4.5%)
6 - Simpson -    13 (4.5%)
8 - Kreuzer -    13 (4.5%)
9 - Cripps -    13 (4.5%)
15 - Docherty -    13 (4.5%)
33 - Everitt -    13 (4.5%)
40 - Jamison -    13 (4.5%)
41 - Casboult -    13 (4.5%)
42 - Tuohy -    13 (4.5%)
7 - Buckley -    12 (4.2%)
28 - Bell -    12 (4.2%)
32 - Graham -    12 (4.2%)

Probables
2 - Menzel -    11 (3.8%)
23 - Henderson -    11 (3.8%)
27 - Armfield -    11 (3.8%)
13 - Yarran -    10 (3.5%)
39 - Thomas -    10 (3.5%)

Possibles
35 - Curnow -    9 (3.1%)
43 - White -    9 (3.1%)
17 - Rowe -    8 (2.8%)
44 - Carrazzo -    7 (2.4%)
1 - Walker -    6 (2.1%)
36 - Wood -    6 (2.1%)

Probably not
12 - Boekhorst -    4 (1.4%)
20 - Holman -    4 (1.4%)
21 - Sheehan -    4 (1.4%)
38 - Byrne -    4 (1.4%)
25 - Smith -    2 (0.7%)
11 - Warnock -    1 (0.3%)
18 - Jaksch -    1 (0.3%)
31 - Dick -    1 (0.3%)
34 - Walsh -    1 (0.3%)

Unlikely
5 - Judd -    0 (0%)
10 - Watson -    0 (0%)
14 - Jones -    0 (0%)
16 - Viojo-Rainbow -    0 (0%)
19 - Giles -    0 (0%)
22 - Tutt -    0 (0%)
24 - Whiley -    0 (0%)
26 - Foster -    0 (0%)
29 - Gowers -    0 (0%)
30 - Johnson -    0 (0%)
37 - Fields -    0 (0%)
46 - Ellard -    0 (0%)
47 - Russell -    0 (0%)


Time for a revote courtesy of our new found cellar dweller status.
http://users.tpg.com.au/jrhass/teamboard.swf
Reply
#63
Lets try and get some more votes in here
Reply
#64
OK, this last 'best 22' poll for the season.

Once completed i will compile all the results to see what, if any, trends are clear.

Here are the results from the last poll...
STARTERS
3 - Murphy    16 (4.5%)
6 - Simpson    16 (4.5%)
7 - Buckley    16 (4.5%)
8 - Kreuzer    16 (4.5%)
9 - Cripps    16 (4.5%)
15 - Docherty    16 (4.5%)
41 - Casboult    16 (4.5%)
42 - Tuohy    16 (4.5%)
4 - Gibbs    15 (4.3%)
33 - Everitt    15 (4.3%)
1 - Walker    14 (4%)
32 - Graham    14 (4%)
35 - Curnow    14 (4%)
40 - Jamison    14 (4%)

PROBABLES
2 - Menzel    13 (3.7%)
43 - White    13 (3.7%)
39 - Thomas    12 (3.4%)
12 - Boekhorst    11 (3.1%)
17 - Rowe    10 (2.8%)
18 - Jaksch    10 (2.8%)
20 - Holman    10 (2.8%)
28 - Bell    10 (2.8%)

POSSIBLES
27 - Armfield    7 (2%)
13 - Yarran    6 (1.7%)
21 - Sheehan    6 (1.7%)
38 - Byrne    6 (1.7%)
36 - Wood    5 (1.4%)
44 - Carrazzo    5 (1.4%)

PROBABLY NOT
23 - Henderson    4 (1.1%)
24 - Whiley    3 (0.9%)
5 - Judd    2 (0.6%)
19 - Giles    2 (0.6%)
34 - Walsh    2 (0.6%)
25 - Smith    1 (0.3%)

UNLIKELY
10 - Watson    0 (0%)
11 - Warnock    0 (0%)
14 - Jones    0 (0%)
16 - Viojo-Rainbow    0 (0%)
22 - Tutt    0 (0%)
26 - Foster    0 (0%)
29 - Gowers    0 (0%)
30 - Johnson    0 (0%)
31 - Dick    0 (0%)
37 - Fields    0 (0%)
46 - Ellard    0 (0%)
47 - Russell    0 (0%)

http://users.tpg.com.au/jrhass/teamboard.swf
Reply
#65
Anyone else wanna have a vote in this before i sift through the results?
Reply
#66
It's interesting that Jaksch received so many votes.  It's either wishful thinking, recognition of his apparent potential or acknowledging that we're rubbish  :-\

Hopefully, it is about his potential and I will be able to jump on the bandwaggon next season  Smile
“Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don’t you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don’t you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?”  Oddball
Reply
#67
(10-05-2015, 11:14 PM)DJC link Wrote:It's interesting that Jaksch received so many votes.  It's either wishful thinking, recognition of his apparent potential or acnowledging that we're rubbish  :-\

I think he probably picked up a few votes for his last couple of games of the year.
While nothing spectacular he showed a few glimpses that were an improvement on his early season efforts.
Reply
#68
(10-06-2015, 12:17 AM)Lods link Wrote:I think he probably picked up a few votes for his last couple of games of the year.
While nothing spectacular he showed a few glimpses that were an improvement on his early season efforts.

I missed those games so my perception is probably not as current as other folk.

I thought he showed a bit early on so, if he's improved on that, we may have a player.
“Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don’t you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don’t you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?”  Oddball
Reply
#69
(10-06-2015, 03:17 AM)DJC link Wrote:I missed those games so my perception is probably not as current as other folk.

I thought he showed a bit early on so, if he's improved on that, we may have a player.

I worry about Jaksch, I know he is very young but his early performance so far is very Liam Jones like!
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"
Reply
#70
(01-08-2015, 11:15 AM)Gointocarlton link Wrote:If Touhy has another shocker at the start of the year, he goes out and Sheehan comes in for mine. Happy to try Jone first up but Watto comes straight in if he fails early. Hard to pick the side which is good, we are starting to get some depth or at the very least, aggressive competition for spots.

Ummm, 3rd in the B & F. Really?
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)