Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Round 8 Question
#8
(05-26-2017, 02:10 AM)PaulP link Wrote:This may well have been mentioned in the "please explain" letter the Club sent to the AFL. After which the AFL acted as it usually does.

Last night on radio it was alleged that neither club responded to the AFL's request.

I like the concept of fining teams, but it's worthless if the persecuted and persecutors both end up being penalised. The AFL should have a clear indication of who instigated or initiated an event before it goes through this process.
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Round 8 Question - by Wet Willie - 05-23-2017, 02:10 AM
Re: Round 8 Question - by PaulP - 05-23-2017, 06:27 AM
Re: Round 8 Question - by Wet Willie - 05-23-2017, 07:30 AM
Re: Round 8 Question - by PaulP - 05-23-2017, 07:50 AM
Re: Round 8 Question - by PaulP - 05-25-2017, 03:10 AM
Re: Round 8 Question - by madbluboy - 05-26-2017, 01:52 AM
Re: Round 8 Question - by PaulP - 05-26-2017, 02:10 AM
Re: Round 8 Question - by LP - 05-26-2017, 02:49 AM
Re: Round 8 Question - by PaulP - 05-26-2017, 03:02 AM
Re: Round 8 Question - by LP - 05-26-2017, 03:05 AM
Re: Round 8 Question - by PaulP - 05-26-2017, 03:14 AM
Re: Round 8 Question - by madbluboy - 05-26-2017, 04:12 AM
Re: Round 8 Question - by LP - 05-26-2017, 04:24 AM
Re: Round 8 Question - by PaulP - 05-26-2017, 04:27 AM
Re: Round 8 Question - by Wet Willie - 05-26-2017, 11:56 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)