+- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com)
+-- Forum: Princes Park (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: Robert Heatley Stand (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-14.html)
+--- Thread: Round 8 Question (/thread-3292.html)
Pages:
1
2
Round 8 Question - Wet Willie - 05-23-2017
After the Round 8 match against St Kilda, we had endless debate about Murphy and Carlisle...
There has been no news on the outcome of the resulting melee. Did anybody get fined?
I know Murphy ended up under about 20 players getting into him...
I would be amazed if Murphy got fined on top of everything else he went through.
Or did it not actually happen in the AFL eyes?
Re: Round 8 Question - PaulP - 05-23-2017
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2017-05-15/match-review-panel-full-statement-round-eight
About half way down the page, there's a reference to the 3rd quarter melee. Letter from the AFL to both clubs, who have 7 days to respond, before the AFL makes a decision.
Re: Round 8 Question - Wet Willie - 05-23-2017
And that time has passed...
I wonder if the AFL now believe it's all too sticky??
Re: Round 8 Question - PaulP - 05-23-2017
(05-23-2017, 07:30 AM)Wet Willie link Wrote:And that time has passed...
I wonder if the AFL now believe it's all too sticky??
Hard to say. There's no guarantee the AFL started the process asap, so we have no way of knowing all the dates in question. You would think a decision would be made this week sometime, but who's to say ? I doubt it's a high priority for them.
Re: Round 8 Question - PaulP - 05-25-2017
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2017-05-25/fine-time-as-league-whacks-four-clubs-for-melees
Re: Round 8 Question - madbluboy - 05-26-2017
I would ask the AFL what we were supposed to do? 4 Saints attacked Murphy before and Carlton player stepped in. Were we supposed to let it go?
Re: Round 8 Question - PaulP - 05-26-2017
(05-26-2017, 01:52 AM)madbluboy link Wrote:I would ask the AFL what we were supposed to do? 4 Saints attacked Murphy before and Carlton player stepped in. Were we supposed to let it go?
This may well have been mentioned in the "please explain" letter the Club sent to the AFL. After which the AFL acted as it usually does.
Re: Round 8 Question - LP - 05-26-2017
(05-26-2017, 02:10 AM)PaulP link Wrote:This may well have been mentioned in the "please explain" letter the Club sent to the AFL. After which the AFL acted as it usually does.
Last night on radio it was alleged that neither club responded to the AFL's request.
I like the concept of fining teams, but it's worthless if the persecuted and persecutors both end up being penalised. The AFL should have a clear indication of who instigated or initiated an event before it goes through this process.
Re: Round 8 Question - PaulP - 05-26-2017
(05-26-2017, 02:49 AM)LP link Wrote:Last night on radio it was alleged that neither club responded to the AFL's request.
......
Well, if true that blows my theory out of the water.
Maybe neither team cared or thought the AFL had already made up their minds and any official letter / explanation would be a waste of time.
Re: Round 8 Question - LP - 05-26-2017
(05-26-2017, 03:02 AM)PaulP link Wrote:Well, if true that blows my theory out of the water.
Maybe neither team cared or thought the AFL had already made up their minds and any official letter / explanation would be a waste of time.
If players and their club can be held collectively responsible, what about a club and it's supporters? :o
Boo me a fine today!