I think she said what she meant and she meant what she said. If she wanted to go off on the surveillance State she could have done that. The moment we reframe lunatic conspiracy theories that way is when we lose the ability to work for the common good. Every philanthropic policy can be undermined as some attempt by out-of-control governments and elites to turn the people into sheep. Try to take guns off the street and that’s the Government trying to prevent patriots from fighting against tyranny. Running vaccination programs will lead to accusations that chips are being inserted to track everybody. By all means, attack the use of tracking and pooling of private information but destroying beneficial government programs won’t do anything in that regard.
PS: Feel free to find some evidence that she has some coherent world view that should earn her some respect.
Edit: I did think she’d been uncharitable towards a mentally ill guy who believed she was in his house but he was given a substantial jail sentence suggesting his issues may have been caused by drug abuse rather than mental illness. Criticism withdrawn on that issue.
PS: Feel free to find some evidence that she has some coherent world view that should earn her some respect.
Edit: I did think she’d been uncharitable towards a mentally ill guy who believed she was in his house but he was given a substantial jail sentence suggesting his issues may have been caused by drug abuse rather than mental illness. Criticism withdrawn on that issue.


