CV and mad panic behaviour

[Mav]

Fun and games in the case challenging the NSW vaccine mandate.

It is argued the vaccination requirement, which will also apply to attending certain retail premises from October 11, is unlawful and invalid on several grounds.

These include that Mr Hazzard had no power to make the orders, failed to consider a number of relevant matters, considered irrelevant matters, and breached the requirements of natural justice.

Barrister Peter King, appearing for construction worker Mr Kassam, said it will be argued Mr Hazzard failed to investigate or inquire as to alternative treatment methods for COVID-19.

He asked vaccine expert Professor Kristine Macartney, a member of the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI), about the opinion of a nutritionist that zinc, vitamin D and vitamin C “would be safe and effective treatments for COVID-19 patients”.

“No, I don’t agree with that,” Professor Macartney said.

Mr King raised a range of other drugs, including ivermectin – which is commonly used to treat parasites including worms – hydroxychloroquine, aspirin, asthma medication singulair, and the antibiotic doxycycline.

Professor Macartney said she has not personally been involved in any studies about the drugs’ effectiveness in treating COVID-19, but she has apprised herself of all the available evidence and reviews.

Asked about the effects of COVID-19 vaccines on pregnant women, including one of the plaintiffs, Professor Macartney said there is “a growing body of evidence on the safety of vaccination in pregnancy”, leading to the recommendation pregnant women receive the vaccination.

She said if a pregnant woman becomes infected with the virus “there is quite significant evidence of risk to the pregnant woman and the foetus”, including miscarriage.

Professor Macartney said COVID-19 vaccines have had one of the largest clinical trials of any vaccine in history, and rejected the contention that they are an “experiment”.

NSW Deputy Chief Health Officer Dr Marianne Gale said vaccination is associated with a reduction in onward transmission, which could stop a worker from catching the virus and spreading it to their household.

In written submissions, lawyers for aged care worker Ms Henry included a lengthy description of the process of injecting a vaccine into someone’s arm, describing it as an “invasive medical procedure”.

The submissions also reference the Magna Carta, which is said to confer a common law right to work, and a recent dissenting decision by one member of the Fair Work Commission, which criticised mandatory vaccination

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/expe...58w09.html
Have to laugh at the bolded bits. Denis Denuto rides again! There’ll no doubt be much reliance placed on “the vibe”.

I bet the tension was at fever pitch when the experts were asked about zinc, vitamin C, HCQ, Ivermectin etc. Will the expert say they are viable treatments? Anything is possible, right? But then the stunning and entirely unpredictable response that they weren’t viable alternatives must have shaken everyone to the core. I hope it sets the scene for the usual parade of loopy proponents to give evidence and endure ritual humiliation.