CV and mad panic behaviour

[Thryleon]

The problem I have with this #3 perspective is that it is basically stated in ignorance of the flip side of the actions of any vaccine, that is keeping hospitalisation numbers low by reducing / preventing severe disease.

It's a weird sort of an argument, like claiming you can use a gun to stop the enemy killing you, like the cause and event is unidirectional.

It's an argument that you virtually contradict in point #4, but that also is asymmetrical because #4 without explicitly stating it implies the risk from the vaccine and Sars-CoV-2 is equal or proportional, but it isn't.

I think as Mav, Baggers or DJC pointed out before, the correct way to look at this what would be the outcome of 6 Million COVID cases versus 6 Million vaccinations. It's a fair question and a very fair comparison to make, because without vaccination we will eventually get to 6 Million COVID cases based on current Sars-CoV-2 virality, it would only be a matter of time. Should we do that math based on global averages?

Actually, I've heard the #3 argument before, .............. it's a dressed up something like the NRA claiming more guns will mean less crime, where they completely ignore the criminal effects of having more guns available?

Like I said, understand the way the data works, and youll arrive at the conclusion.

25 million double vaccinated people will yield x amount of deaths (currently .009 of 6 million).

Covids numbers are similar in our population, and this is an argument that will be hijacked (much like you have here) and the point was made to show you how this is going to be presented (is being presented).

#4 doesnt contradict it.  They are both true observations of how this is going to pan out.

Just call me predicting the future.