12-01-2020, 09:16 PM
(12-01-2020, 11:46 AM)Thryleon date Wrote:Note they are people and are fallible. In gobbos case she needed them and in the first conversation with them she was recorded illegally despite her telling them not to and asking if it were being recorded.Sort of like a lawyer who continues to defend a crook they know is guilty!
Unacceptable
Personally, I've never understood the defence of trivial legal technicalities, and they are often quite trivial like the guy who use to get people off speeding offences by exposing police cars were using the wrong brand of tyre. It seems to start with this premise. "There is this dodgy lawyer". Then the client of the dodgy lawyer who discloses that technical loophole is sometimes rewarded with eternal immunity via double jeopardy!
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"