Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Goaltracker 2018
After 13 games

2016

Goals 142 Behinds 123-(For 975 against 1202)
Percentage 81.1 %

2017(Target 224-224-1568)

Goals 137 Behinds 118-(For 940 against 1150 )
Percentage 81.7 %


2018
(2017 Target 232 Goals- 202 behinds-1594)

Goals-117  Behinds - 116
Percentage  62.7 % (For- 818, Against- 1305)


Goalkickers
(2017 Target Casboult  34)

2017


Casboult 20
Wright 17
Silvagni 11
Gibbs 11

2018


Curnow 19
M Wright 14
McKay 12
Casboult 12

Despite the loss we managed to improve our percentage (slightly) this week.
Reply
Thanks for your work on this Lods. Much appreciated.
Reply
(06-26-2018, 10:41 AM)PaulP link Wrote:Thanks for your work on this Lods. Much appreciated.

Thanks Paul Smile
It's actually not a lot of trouble...the 2016 and 2017 are just a copy and paste.
The 2018 is just adding the score from the weekend.
And the Goalkickers are just a copy /paste from Footwire
It takes about five minutes.

Just a shame the figures aren't trending upwards....hopefully we can make a dent in the remaining games.
Reply
(06-26-2018, 10:29 AM)Lods link Wrote:Curnow 19
M Wright 14
McKay 12
Casboult 12

Some positives:

We have covered Gibbs’ contribution from 2017.

Two of our top four goalkickers weren’t in the top four last season.

One of our top four goalkickers can’t get a game!

Very much a work in progress but there are some promising signs  Smile
“Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don’t you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don’t you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?”  Oddball
Reply
(06-26-2018, 11:12 PM)DJC link Wrote:Some positives:

We have covered Gibbs’ contribution from 2017.

Two of our top four goalkickers weren’t in the top four last season.

One of our top four goalkickers can’t get a game!

Very much a work in progress but there are some promising signs  Smile

Thats a false positive (the bold one).

He's top 4 for goal kicking because we are so poor at kicking goals as a team and it can be argued that Mckay wouldnt be in anyone elses top 4 goal kickers at another club.

If he was sitting top 4 for goals kicked, and the top two had kicked 100 between them, then this might be a positive.

"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson
Reply
(06-27-2018, 02:31 AM)Thryleon link Wrote:Thats a false positive (the bold one).

He's top 4 for goal kicking because we are so poor at kicking goals as a team and it can be argued that Mckay wouldnt be in anyone elses top 4 goal kickers at another club.

If he was sitting top 4 for goals kicked, and the top two had kicked 100 between them, then this might be a positive.

On the other side he is on 2 goals per game. I'll certainly take that.
Reply
I reckon our blokes must be tired as I think they travelled to Russia to play in the World Cup too. I say that as the Socceroos are like Carlton. Can take it up to the best in general play but can't kicked any bloody goals when on top.
Reply
(06-26-2018, 11:12 PM)DJC link Wrote:One of our top four goalkickers can’t get a game!

Have many of his goals come from KPP marking or bullocking type play?

Did McKay's goals come at the expense of some other small forward?
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"
Reply
(06-27-2018, 02:58 AM)LP link Wrote:Have many of his goals come from KPP marking or bullocking type play?

Did McKay's goals come at the expense of some other small forward?
Probably more than you think. Ok contested marking in the VFL.

Don't care right now anyway, as long as he is kicking them. Rest will come.
Reply
(06-27-2018, 02:46 AM)laj link Wrote:On the other side he is on 2 goals per game. I'll certainly take that.


Me too, but it tells a story.



"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)