Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Goaltracker 2018
#81
Thanks Lods.

Less shots on goal.
Less points for
Higher points against.

Worrying trend when comparing to 2 years ago.
Reply
#82
Percentage is a concern too Sad

I'd actually like to see the comparative injury lists for this stage of the  season in 2016/7 just to get some perspective.
Reply
#83
(05-07-2018, 08:51 AM)Lods link Wrote:Percentage is a concern too Sad

I'd actually like to see the comparative injury lists for this stage of the  season in 2016/7 just to get some perspective.

This year is definitely worse for injuries....but not sure its all down to injuries. I reckon the age of the teams being put out each week is a lot lower.
Reply
#84
After Round 8

2016

Goals 83 Behinds 82- (For 580 against 703)
Percentage 82.5 %

2017
Goals 85 Behinds 71- (For 581 against 724)
Percentage 80.3 %

2018
(2017 Target 232 Goals- 202 behinds-1594)

Goals-81  Behinds - 71
Percentage  69.6 % (For- 557, Against- 800)


Goalkickers
(2017 Target Casboult  34)

2017

Casboult 13
Wright 12
Silvagni 8
Weitering 7

2018

Curnow 13
Casboult 11
Wright 10
McKay 9
Fisher- 6
Garlett 5

Reply
#85
After Round 9

2016

Goals 89 Behinds 92-(For 626  against 816)
Percentage 76.7 %

2017
Goals 92 Behinds 80-(For 632 against 810)
Percentage 78 %

2018
(2017 Target 232 Goals- 202 behinds-1594)

Goals-88  Behinds - 79
Percentage  63.3 % (For- 607, Against- 959)


Goalkickers
(2017 Target Casboult  34)

2017

Casboult 15
Wright 12
Silvagni 8
Weitering 7

2018

Curnow 13
McKay 11
Casboult 11
Wright 10
Fisher- 7

*There's a long way to go but that percentage (63.3%) is not good...terrible in fact!
Even in our poorest seasons of the last 15 years we have never finished a season with a percentage that low. In fact we have to go back to 1901 to get below that mark.
Something to work on in the second half of the year Wink

Interesting trivia point though....after Round 9 in 2015, the year we declared a rebuild, our percentage was 63.2%...so we're up on that. ;D
Reply
#86
Four goal kickers now in double figures at round 9, compare that to other years.

We actually are improving, you wouldn't know it though.
Reply
#87
I think it means our spread of goalkickers is now less ??? :-\
Reply
#88
(05-22-2018, 06:09 AM)Lods link Wrote:After Round 9

2016

Goals 89 Behinds 92-(For 626  against 816)
Percentage 76.7 %

2017
Goals 92 Behinds 80-(For 632 against 810)
Percentage 78 %

2018
(2017 Target 232 Goals- 202 behinds-1594)

Goals-88  Behinds - 79
Percentage  63.3 % (For- 607, Against- 959)


Goalkickers
(2017 Target Casboult  34)

2017

Casboult 15
Wright 12
Silvagni 8
Weitering 7

2018

Curnow 13
McKay 11
Casboult 11
Wright 10
Fisher- 7

*There's a long way to go but that percentage (63.3%) is not good...terrible in fact!
Even in our poorest seasons of the last 15 years we have never finished a season with a percentage that low. In fact we have to go back to 1901 to get below that mark.
Something to work on in the second half of the year Wink

Interesting trivia point though....after Round 9 in 2015, the year we declared a rebuild, our percentage was 63.2%...so we're up on that. ;D

Surprised our total is close to 2016 as at that point we were on a winning streak.
Reply
#89
Pretty spooky ;D...pretty sad Sad

Carlton percentages after Round 9

2015- 63.2453567
2018- 63.2950990
Reply
#90
(05-22-2018, 07:02 AM)Lods link Wrote:Pretty spooky ;D...pretty sad Sad

Carlton percentages after Round 9

2015- 63.2453567
2018- 63.2950990

So if i'm reading between the lines, we are 0.05% above where we were when Mick got sacked?

Pretty depressing given that all we have to hold on to is the hope that we are on the right path.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)