![]() |
|
Board change - Printable Version +- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com) +-- Forum: Forum (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-9.html) +--- Forum: Notice Board (Visitors Enter Here) (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-10.html) +--- Thread: Board change (/thread-2379.html) |
Re: Board change - JonHenry - 10-20-2015 (10-20-2015, 03:52 AM)jeza link Wrote:Can I ask how someone can become a board member without being voted onto the board by the members? Or we could get Adrian GleesonĀ :
Re: Board change - Jeffy38 - 10-20-2015 (10-20-2015, 04:10 AM)JonHenry link Wrote:Or we could get Adrian GleesonĀ : Didn't you get the email from the prez? Pretty much explained it for mine. I think we all need to move ok from board members being assigned to silvertail benefactors and embrace some diversity. Let's face it, the old way aint working Re: Board change - kruddler - 10-20-2015 (10-20-2015, 03:52 AM)jeza link Wrote:Can I ask how someone can become a board member without being voted onto the board by the members? Take that a step further Jeza, how many people on the board got on the board via a vote? I reckon over half of our board over the past 15 years got on without a vote. Re: Board change - Lods - 10-20-2015 (10-20-2015, 07:17 AM)kruddler link Wrote:Take that a step further Jeza, how many people on the board got on the board via a vote? The argument is "Would you trust the members to vote? "We'd end up with a board full of ex-footballers!" Well guess what....it hasn't worked the way we've been doing things....and some of those ex-footballers have probably done very well for themselves. Re: Board change - shadesy - 10-20-2015 What qualifications does Eddie McGuire have to run a football club? Re: Board change - JonHenry - 10-20-2015 (10-20-2015, 07:32 AM)shadesy link Wrote:What qualifications does Eddie McGuire have to run a football club? The same he had to run channel 9 SFA Re: Board change - kruddler - 10-20-2015 (10-20-2015, 07:20 AM)Lods link Wrote:The argument is I think we've had this discussion a few times. Sooner or later, you have to give the members some say in it all. Perhaps its a critical step in actually growing our membership base! In regards to ex-footballers.... 1. They would have to nominate, can't think of too many that would do so. Hence, it's unlikely to get a board full of them. 2. If they do nominate, they would probably be very well credentialled, and we do know they will have best intentions and be passionate about their role! 3. Can't be any worse with how we've been going anyway. Re: Board change - DJC - 10-20-2015 (10-20-2015, 07:32 AM)shadesy link Wrote:What qualifications does Eddie McGuire have to run a football club? He has been involved in the football industry (from the media side) for most of his working life, knows how to manipulate the media to Collingwood's benefit and has a solid business and political background. I would take Eddie over LoGiudice in a heartbeat. Re: Board change - shadesy - 10-20-2015 (10-20-2015, 07:38 AM)DJC link Wrote:He has been involved in the football industry (from the media side) for most of his working life, knows how to manipulate the media to Collingwood's benefit and has a solid business and political background. So would I. But this nonsense about qualifications to run a football club is ust that Nonsense. People bring different skill sets to all sorts of positions, and we have had the Head of NAB and Australia Post and we are no where. We have had ex players on the board...Sticks anyone? Glesson? Re: Board change - DJC - 10-20-2015 (10-20-2015, 07:46 AM)shadesy link Wrote:So would I. But this nonsense about qualifications to run a football club is ust that Nonsense. People bring different skill sets to all sorts of positions, and we have had the Head of NAB and Australia Post and we are no where. I reckon Wet Toast has a good mix, particularly with their ex-WAFL blokes who have succeeded in other careers. I don't think former players are the answer per se, but former players who have been successful in business, management, administration, etc would be a different kettle of fish. |