The only problem with a good win like that on a Thursday night is that it's too long until our next game; the anticipation is killing me!
It was interesting to hear several players talk about the sessions where they analysed what didn't work against the Tigers and set about addressing those areas.
I thought that Cameron was Geelong's only clear winner. With the exception of his opponents, all of our players won or equalised their positions. It was an excellent team performance, with several players capping consistent performances with outstanding periods; such as Saad's first half, Crippa's third quarter and Harry's last ten minutes. Ed turned the clock back with the job he did on Guthrie while having an impact in our forward half. I loved Charlie's response when he goaled after Ed's pass. The response to Ed's goal was pretty special too. He is a heart and soul player and the decision to keep him on for another season looks like paying dividends.
I guess we've answered the question about whether we can play Charlie, Harry, Jack, Tom, Pitto, Crippa, Weiters and Young in the same team ... and why wouldn't you
Jack did take a couple ruck contests, as did Cripps, but I thought that we got much better value from him focusing on his tall forward role. He is a smart footballer who can create opportunities for those around him with his positioning and good use of the footy.
The Owies/Motlop/Durdin combination worked really well and created headaches for the Geelong defence while assisting our defence as required. Having three small forwards with different bags of tricks is a positive. I was surprised to see that Motlop wasn't credited with any tackles. He laid several, including one where Tuohy gave him a forearm to the face. Perhaps I need to look up the CD definition of tackle :-\
Weitering was very good on Hawkins and Pitto and De Koning both rucked very well against him. I imagine that Matty K put a lot of thought into stopping Hawkins getting shots at goal from ruck contests.
Vossy's pressers are always good value, even when we lose. Scott is always surly when the Cats lose and he seems to go out of his way to find excuses for him and his team. That said, I thought that he did try to provide relevant responses to some well-directed questions.
Scott's decision to sub Stanley out didn't help their cause. Pitto and De Koning went to work on Blicavs, Cripps was freed up and Whyte didn't fire a shot. O'Brien had more impact but I would have preferred Silvagni to have stayed on the ground.
Note to G2C: You can officially add Hollands to the top of our 2-way running power ladder
Go Blues!
“Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don’t you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don’t you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?” Oddball