CV and mad panic behaviour

[Mav]

You always play the man Mav, not the ball.

Says it all.

Maybe you should avoid picking up the ball if you don’t like being tackled.

[ElwoodBlues1]

Novavax (sp?) coming soon too?

Yep...and it has been hyped up to be superior but again its untested on the masses so those choosing to have it will be the lab rats.
Not sure how it's priced per jab either.

[LP]

Yep...and it has been hyped up to be superior but again its untested on the masses so those choosing to have it will be the lab rats.
Not sure how it's priced per jab either.

Variety is the spice of life, there is burgeoning evidence cross vaccination might provide the best response of all. Resilient systems have redundancy built in either by accident or by design.

What is the technology of the Novavax based vaccine solution?

Have you been vaccinated [member=57]ElwoodBlues1[/member] , what is your personal stance on this issue?

[flyboy77]

From a switched on Associate Professor of Viral Immunology in Canada.

They issues are well broken down for quick access.

https://dryburgh.com/wp-content/uploads/...-FINAL.pdf

[flyboy77]

Maybe you should avoid picking up the ball if you don’t like being tackled.

Your tackling is about as innocuous as most of our current players. Sadly.

[Mav]

Seems to have put your nose out of joint though. And to think I didn’t need to lower myself to name-calling like you do.

[flyboy77]

Very funny Mav - i never realised you were so sensitive petal. Sorry  :

To digress, more on the Delta variant from a US expert.

https://www.francesoir.fr/videos-les-deb...U4.twitter

[LP]

From a switched on Associate Professor of Viral Immunology in Canada.

They issues are well broken down for quick access.

https://dryburgh.com/wp-content/uploads/...-FINAL.pdf

Best not show [member=57]ElwoodBlues1[/member]‍ those reports because it will destroy his confidence in Pfizer, and Novavax will be even worse if you think the relative size of the trial study bears much importance! :o

[PaulP]

Best not show [member=57]ElwoodBlues1[/member]‍ those reports because it will destroy his confidence in Pfizer, and Novavax will be even worse if you think the relative size of the trial study bears much importance! :o

That study is 200 pages long, and I'd guess even if I did read it all, a fair whack would go over my head. Just reading the executive summary, it seems to focus on "children, adolescents and young adults of child bearing age". The first two are obvious enough, but what age group does the last category include ?

[LP]

Very funny Mav - i never realised you were so sensitive petal. Sorry  :

To digress, more on the Delta variant from a US expert.

https://www.francesoir.fr/videos-les-deb...U4.twitter

We can't take anything offered by Dr Peter "HCQ" McCullough seriously, he's been discredited repeatedly for the last six months with every formal large scale study showing his original paper is worthless, at least in a scientific context, politically perhaps the paper is quite valuable when much of your funding comes from the certain right wing sources.

And yes, an R[sub]0[/sub] = 7.0 is about a magnitude more infectious than R[sub]0[/sub] = 2.5, so actually worse than 3x, the 3x Macron allegedly states, well maybe that a lost in translation moment, the question is was that a mistake on Dr HCQ's part of deviously manipulated for political purposes?