(06-08-2017, 02:18 AM)DJC link Wrote:He was exonerated of the Holdsworthy charges (one of my army homes!).
I hate that word exonerated, because it's used in the media context that implies no involvement or that the charges were fanciful.
But generally in Australia as I understand things it means someone who was initially found guilty had the decision reversed on some grounds by a higher court, often that is a technicality such as a breach of procedure by investigators or tainted evidence.
In that respect it's different from being acquitted, which as I understand is generally a not guilty finding in the first instance.
The public perception of those terms is often the reverse because exoneration is often associated with fraudulent accusations or evidence discovered after a conviction!
It's miles away from suggesting somebody wasn't involved, or that the charges were fraudulent, wrong or fanciful.
Maybe Mav can clarify.
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"

