04-26-2017, 12:24 PM
(04-26-2017, 12:09 PM)Thryleon link Wrote:This isn't about Malthouse.
I'm saying that no employee of any organisation would enjoy a succession plan forced upon them.
What part of that point is lost on you??
I couldn't care if it was Malthouse or any other afl coach. It was a daft idea to begin with, and we are yet to see a player turn assistant turn senior coach all in one club and enjoy any decent success.
Even Ratten went to Melbourne before coming to us.
Whether they like it or not is not relevant. I think conceptually a succession plan is a great idea. Otherwise what else is there ? The usual media circus, mounting pressure, loss after loss, then the coach gets sacked. You think that's better ? The fact that Bucks so far has stunk it up does not invalidate the original idea. The idea is good - the choice of replacement, perhaps less so.

