Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"Coaching To Win" VS "Playing For The Future"
#35
I doubt there is a player who is worse with 50 games under their belt than 2, so I believe senior game time equals growth. As with everything, it takes smart management. You can't look at one game in isolation, if Watto has has been told: you have 6 weeks to cement your spot, then I see no damage in that one game. If he is performing well, gets his time in the seniors, then is immediately dropped for it - I believe that causes plenty of damage and mental issues.

Murphy was rated as the best player in the game by coaches, he's hardly an example of a bad outcome and collision injuries 7 years after he started aren't a reflection of him getting early game time IMO.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: "Coaching To Win" VS "Playing For The Future" - by ItsOurTime - 05-20-2015, 03:53 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)