(04-08-2017, 06:19 AM)mateinone link Wrote:A lot and it isn't great, I don't think anyone thinks it is. But it is undeniable that the West make more effort to direct their strikes in a way to try and minimize the impact on civilians, but it doesn't always work and sometimes there have been terrible consequences. Nobody is saying that the west is without fault, but it can't be denied by anyone that there has been an attempt by the world to define acceptable use of force, as opposed to War Crimes.
Assad makes no distinction at all. I find it hard to believe that anyone would believe for a moment that if all evidence was on the table and he was before the International Courts in the Hague that he would be found guilty of War Crimes.
I don't see though why the discussion is "We do bad crap too"...
Shouldn't the discussion be
Who was responsible for the chemical attack in Syria?
What actions are to be taken against those responsible?
If the answer to A is Syria (or it's allies), then it is hard to argue against the US response isn't it?
It is a terrible world where armed conflict is the answer to any situation, but I think it would be niave of anyone to think that it is never required.
All in all it says little that is impressive about we humans when it comes to handling conflict/difficulties between each other. Perceived bad person does sh1tty thing, so perceived good people do sh1tty thing, but just not as sh1tty. Bad person retaliates, good people retaliate... nicely. And so goes the cycle of stupidity...
Only our ruthless best, from Board to bootstudders will get us no. 17