Trumpled (Alternative Leading)

[cookie2]

But here's the thing.  Even those who doubt the official version of the WTC collapse have little time for the Pentagon conspiracy theory. 

Here's an article entitled "The Pentagon No-757-Crash Theory: Booby Trap for 9/11 Skeptics" written byJim Hoffman, a leading 9/11 sceptic, in which he debunked the work of Messnay and others: http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/pentagontrap.html.

Once you get caught out peddling falsehoods, I'm afraid you have little credibility.  If any facts (not opinions or insinuations) asserted by Messnay can be independently verified, then those facts can properly enter the debate.  But if he claims it's raining, you wouldn't believe it unless you stuck your head out the window to see for yourself.

So how come you are prepared to take on board all the stuff about Russia influencing the US elections when, to my knowledge no serious proof or evidence has been tabled? Shouldn't that in your parlance be classified as conspiracy theory?