Trumpled (Alternative Leading)

[cookie2]

Credibility counts.  The author is a major conspiracy theorist who published a couple of books called The Big Lie and Pentagate.  In the first, he argued that 9/11 was a false flag operation by the US military/industrial complex in order to impose military rule, employing Bin Laden who was a US agent.  In the second, he suggested that the Pentagon was struck, not by a plane but by a missile strike ordered by White House Right-wingers.  Look, maybe some find this sort of conspiracy theory worthy, but I don't.  I see it as a red flag, pardon the pun.  Add that to his links with Russia and I think he has a credibility problem.

There are many others who subscribe to the 9/11 false flag theories - he is by no means alone on that.  Some who I believe are credible and serious journalistic sources in the US share the same concerns/doubts as to the official version of events.

As far as the military/industrial complex is concerned, it is well known to be totally ruthless in preserving its $1TR annual budget. The US was warned about its rising influence post WW2 many years ago by Eisenhower when he left office. I personally don't know whether there's any truth to it there have been enough significant doubts raised by plenty of experts about the official version of events.

As for his "links" with Russia, apart from his having published stuff in Russia, I don't know, but I would certainly give him as much credibility as I do the MSM, especially that in the US.

Anyway, if you think it's all conspiracy theories (term invented by the CIA) that's up to you, I'm not trying to convince you otherwise  - me, I continue to watch and keep an open mind.