02-26-2017, 08:03 PM
(02-26-2017, 11:54 AM)DJC link Wrote:That's very unkind to ruckmen Paul
Harry was a ruckman/forward at TAC and our stated preference is for blokes who can play multiple roles. He clearly knows how to ruck and has the physical attributes to do so. I'd like see him develop into a key forward who can ruck when required and I don't expect him to be vying with Kreuzer for our first ruck position.
I just don't understand why the sky will fall if we play Harry in the ruck :-\
I'm
Perhaps I was unkind, and I'm not from the Grant Thomas School, but I really want to see Harry spend plenty of time up forward in the early part of his career. Perhaps further down the track, like when he's played 300 games, then he can ruck. Key forward is more important than ruck IMO, and since we have a dearth of the former, I say play him forward.
My 2 bob's worth.


