02-09-2017, 01:14 AM
(02-09-2017, 12:55 AM)kruddler link Wrote:Someone can not be wrong 100% of the time, just as someone can not be right 100% of the time.
Your anti-mick stance is such that you believeĀ everything he ever did was wrong and to suggest otherwise is wrong.
Mick won us a final...and did other good things as well. The sooner you accept it the better off we'll be.
On a personal level, I've never liked Mick, but that's neither here nor there. I wanted him to succeed at CFC more than you will ever realize.
His coaching record includes 3 flags. Whether this is considered an under or over or fair achievement, I will leave for others to debate. His record at the Dogs, Weagles and Pies was fair enough. I don't begrudge him that.
His record at our club stank to high heaven.
Every new coach that arrives at a club will seek to remake the list in their own image. Whether they do this straight away, or wait a season will vary. Lists are gutted all the time. I fail to see why he or any other coach should get credit for a process that is almost routine.
The players that many on here consider lacking commitment, lacking talent, head cases etc. has us regularly in finals. Malthouse supposedly replaced these players with players that had the right attitude - like Dre Everitt, Kristian Jaksch, Clem Smith, Jayden Foster, Dillon Viojo-Rainbow and Blaine Boekhorst. All recruited under Mick's watch. All except Boeky have done zilch.
I have no personal issue with Daisy, but his time at the club has been an epic fail. He was brought to the club against the advice of the club doctor, as our friend Jofo will attest.
Mick was given carte blanche when he arrived to do as he pleased. Whatever good things he did during his time here are not apparent to me.

