05-16-2015, 04:13 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-16-2015, 04:15 AM by PassIt2Carrots.)
(05-16-2015, 12:06 AM)Thryleon link Wrote:It's not hypothetical.
They built a team with young players whilst trying to win games.
Which is exactly what we can do.
Quote:They didn't drop Luke power whilst trying to blood youngsters, and have brought in mature recruits to make sure that spots are earned not gifted.
You can have a mix no doubt, but playing blokes like Ellard and Armfield ahead of a Nick Graham is criminal, and far from creating a winning culture.
Quote:What you are advocating is quite different and is a hypothetical in itself.
How? Please explain.
Quote:Mind you this exact practice of gifting games to youngsters is exactly what we grumble about when Pagan sacked all our senior players realised his mistake too late tried to recruit some older leaders and the result is the Carlton Football Club as it exists today.
Absolute pure deflection at it's best. What exactly does this have to do with playing a bloke like Nick Graham?
Quote:But you think it's going to be okay provided we sack the coach so I understand why this concept doesn't make sense to you.
It's so funny, anything that questions Malthouse's methods you argue to the death. It's a losing argument. Let it go. He has failed, and he wont be here much longer. He will be remembered as a failure at Carlton, you can take that to the bank.
Ignorance is bliss.
ONWARDS AND UPWARDS!
ONWARDS AND UPWARDS!

