10-29-2016, 09:34 AM
(10-29-2016, 08:39 AM)DJC link Wrote:There's a great difference between the two situations. For a start, Edelsten was convicted of attempting to pervert the course of justice and is actively conniving to avoid paying his debts.
Edelsten is regularly in the media for the wrong reasons including the latest episode where his debt to CFC was raised. That's not good publicity for the club.
again show me any factual evidence he has been a negative impact on our commercial operations. i again point out he has no formal involvement with the club other than being a supporter/contributor. the club does not put out press releases re the doc. so which part of the constitution specifically will allow the club to remove him as a member? its very easy to say piss him off /get rid of him but how do u propose it gets done that is legal?

