09-12-2016, 12:43 AM
(09-12-2016, 12:36 AM)DJC link Wrote:Yes, but she has a long way to go before she can match Trump's ongoing sequence of terrible weeks.
I don't think there's been two more uninspiring candidates. Well, perhaps Rudd and Abbott would go close.
She doesn't have to match him, she's held to a higher standard.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/09/08/opi...sight.html
Quote:“Donald Trump, the Republican nominee for President, does not so much struggle with the truth as strangle it altogether. He lies to avoid. He lies to inflame. He lies to promote and to preen. Sometimes he seems to lie just for the hell of it. He traffics in conspiracy theories that he cannot possibly believe and in grotesque promises that he cannot possibly fulfill. When found out, he changes the subject — or lies larger.”
And yet in polls like the CNN/ORC poll released Tuesday, Trump leads Clinton on the issue of being honest and trustworthy by 15 percentage points.
Quote:I believe that this is in large part because we, an irresponsible media, have built a false equivalency in which the choice between Clinton and Trump seems to have equally bad implications, because we have framed it as a choice between a liar and a lunatic.
But this obscures the fact that the lunatic is also a pathological liar of a kind and quality that we have not seen in recent presidential politics and perhaps ever.
Trump is in a category all his own.
Part of the reason for Clinton’s problems is that she is being held to a traditional level of honesty and integrity, as she should be.
But Trump is being held to a wholly different, more flexible standard. When he takes a different position over years or months or days or even hours, that is not simply an innocent evolution, but a flat-out lie.
2012 HAPPENED!!!!!!!

