09-08-2016, 02:00 AM
Surprise, surprise 
)
The problem for Clinton is that Trump can be the lightning rod for frustration over the Middle East and terrorism. That his "policies" are BS isn't the point. There's an appetite for knocking over the chess board and starting over. Of course, such a simplistic strategy doesn't work well in practice. The US knocked over the chess board in Afghanistan and Iraq but things didn't work out so well. Trump likes to limit the issue to defeating ISIS militarily. Sure, the US can invade ISIS territory and "win" fairly quickly but what happens then?
Why in hell would they make Matt Lauer the moderator? That's like getting Kochie or Stefanovic to moderate a national security debate.
)The problem for Clinton is that Trump can be the lightning rod for frustration over the Middle East and terrorism. That his "policies" are BS isn't the point. There's an appetite for knocking over the chess board and starting over. Of course, such a simplistic strategy doesn't work well in practice. The US knocked over the chess board in Afghanistan and Iraq but things didn't work out so well. Trump likes to limit the issue to defeating ISIS militarily. Sure, the US can invade ISIS territory and "win" fairly quickly but what happens then?
Why in hell would they make Matt Lauer the moderator? That's like getting Kochie or Stefanovic to moderate a national security debate.