09-05-2016, 12:28 AM
(09-04-2016, 07:14 AM)Mav link Wrote:Letter from the Directors of the CDC and NIH:
http://www.nj.com/opinion/index.ssf/2016...opini.html
Some critical thinking will help you there Mav.
If there are 16800 cases, assuming 50/50 men and women will mean 8400 women. At any one time in the USA 4% of all women are pregnant, 4% of 8400 is 336 but that report states 1595 pregnant women with Zika. By definition if there were 1595 is pregnant women infected with Zika that would be 4% of all Zika cases, which would have to be 39875 female cases of Zika infection and assuming a 50/50 distribution of sexes 79850 cases in total.
Where does the 16800 cases come from that has a massive number of 1595 pregnant women, that would need about 19% of women in that group to be pregnant which is 5X the US average?
They must be rooting for Zika!
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"

