08-14-2016, 09:27 AM
I’m still at home, but I do expect that to change tomorrow. I’d better get the votes in while I can.
Team: E
The first half was terrible, truly pathetic. After half time we were not do bad, in fact we probably deserved to win. But we have no idea how to kick goals. Even so, coming back as we did in conditions that should have very much helped Brisbane, was promising.
The result? Not good enough.
Votes:
[2.5] Ed Curnow
[2.5] Cripps
[2] Tuohy
[2] Simpson
[1.5] Casboult
[1.5] White
[1] Gibbs
[1] Docherty
[0.5] Kreuzer
[0.5] Jack Silvagni
Explanations:
[2.5] Ed Curnow: Did a job and got a lot of the ball. One of very few 4 quarter players, even though his kicking was not at its best.
[2.5] Cripps: Cripps was excellent, especially since he was injured. Now he needs to get his disposal to the level of his ball getting ability.
[2] Tuohy: Another very solid game from Tuohy.
[2] Simpson: Down on his recent efforts and his disposal was terrible in patches, but he was one of the reasons we got back into the game.
[1.5] Casboult: Took marks ad kicked goals. Showed what he can do.
[1.5] White: Easily our best large defender, he had 4 good quarters.
[1] Gibbs: Not as good as he has been, but he and Cripps worked very well on our clearances.
[1] Docherty: Like Gibbs he was down a bit compared to recently, but he was very useful.
[0.5] Kreuzer: One of his better games in the ruck, but only 1 mark for the day.
[0.5] Jack Silvagni: 3 goals and never looked like missing. If we had any idea how to get the ball to him he would have kicked a lot more.
Honourable Mentions:
Buckley: Pathetic early, but lifted after half time. His kicking was off though: he normally slots his snaps.
Boekhorst: So bad early that it was not funny: 2 possessions in the first half and he was supposed to be on Zorko (who killed us). In the 2nd half he did play on Zorko and kept him down to 6 possessions after half time while doing more himself.
Weitering: Not 100% fit and got hurt, but did a solid job in defence. But the confidence and the intercept marking isn’t there at the moment.
Team: E
The first half was terrible, truly pathetic. After half time we were not do bad, in fact we probably deserved to win. But we have no idea how to kick goals. Even so, coming back as we did in conditions that should have very much helped Brisbane, was promising.
The result? Not good enough.
Votes:
[2.5] Ed Curnow
[2.5] Cripps
[2] Tuohy
[2] Simpson
[1.5] Casboult
[1.5] White
[1] Gibbs
[1] Docherty
[0.5] Kreuzer
[0.5] Jack Silvagni
Explanations:
[2.5] Ed Curnow: Did a job and got a lot of the ball. One of very few 4 quarter players, even though his kicking was not at its best.
[2.5] Cripps: Cripps was excellent, especially since he was injured. Now he needs to get his disposal to the level of his ball getting ability.
[2] Tuohy: Another very solid game from Tuohy.
[2] Simpson: Down on his recent efforts and his disposal was terrible in patches, but he was one of the reasons we got back into the game.
[1.5] Casboult: Took marks ad kicked goals. Showed what he can do.
[1.5] White: Easily our best large defender, he had 4 good quarters.
[1] Gibbs: Not as good as he has been, but he and Cripps worked very well on our clearances.
[1] Docherty: Like Gibbs he was down a bit compared to recently, but he was very useful.
[0.5] Kreuzer: One of his better games in the ruck, but only 1 mark for the day.
[0.5] Jack Silvagni: 3 goals and never looked like missing. If we had any idea how to get the ball to him he would have kicked a lot more.
Honourable Mentions:
Buckley: Pathetic early, but lifted after half time. His kicking was off though: he normally slots his snaps.
Boekhorst: So bad early that it was not funny: 2 possessions in the first half and he was supposed to be on Zorko (who killed us). In the 2nd half he did play on Zorko and kept him down to 6 possessions after half time while doing more himself.
Weitering: Not 100% fit and got hurt, but did a solid job in defence. But the confidence and the intercept marking isn’t there at the moment.
Live Long and Prosper!