08-14-2016, 03:43 AM
(08-14-2016, 03:26 AM)Robblues link Wrote:I believe your right, Laj , the twin key forwards has been more successful. So why would Match committee /coach continue with the single key forward option? I mean, ok jones , Everitt Would be the obviously us choices, but they have gone other ways. Sure they see better than we do , so interesting to hear if any one has any inside thoughts on this?
A problem that Levi creates, is that we really labour to get goal kicking opportunities , and when he regularly fluffs them, it must deflate the team moral in general.
With the extra season Charlie & Harry will have under there belt, let's hope they can add to the attack next year to create the twin attack option.
That would be same at Collingwood with Cloke, and even Richmond with Richo. Both a bit better than Levi admittedly.
Anyway, with twin forwards, it spreads the defence more opening it up for others to kick goals. Even if the likes of Jones has a bad day he still takes a man or two, meaning less defenders for Levi and a weaker defender for Everitt and SOS, as the scoreboard attests. We score more easily hence kick alot higher scores, hence the odd miss doesn't deflate as you feel there's another chance around the corner. When struggling to kick 6-8 goals a game, when we had one key forward then those misses hurt.