05-06-2015, 12:33 PM
(05-06-2015, 12:18 PM)Thryleon link Wrote:Again I must disagree.
Change can be dangerous when it's change for making changes sake.
In a football club, continuity is king.
Teams get better when they approach 100 games playing footy together.
Teams execute plans better when they play together more often. That means not five games of playing footy together and writing blokes off or changing tactics frequently or moving players backwards and forwards on the field.
I think our football department needs to be left to work their way through this, just like it should have been back in 2012, but, at least we are structured in our inability to perform. There is elements of a formation I can see in our play, which tells me that the blokes are trying something but it's not working... Yet.
We are woeful, the plan we are executing is woeful, its a defensive, negative, unfashionable, oudated piece of work that you would associate with the worst clubs in the comp.
We lack flair, cant score and its a shocking brand to watch.......we wont attract members/supporters or sponsors if we wait another 100 games.
Its more dangerous to do nothing......you reckon ManU, Chelsea, Bayern Munich etc would let their teams be hammered every week and do nothing, not likely....
The Romans sat back did nothing and lost an Empire......
There is an old saying..Nothing diminishes anxiety faster than action.....