(04-23-2016, 11:32 PM)Raydan link Wrote:C'mon Kruddler, Malthouse was allowed all sorts of freedom, Daisy, Jones, Tutt, Everitt who he even flew to see.
As for the others Henderson wanted to go, Bell wanted to go, Yarran wanted to go and Menzel wasn't a hard worker, something MM must have tolerared as he got a game weekly. Don't re write history to support your arguement
Why did they want to go?
No, not because they didn't like Mick. They left after Mick was gone! Don't rewrite history to support yours.
They left because we were on their back about 'putting in' and they couldn't handle it. We thought it was in the clubs best interests to move on players who were not committed. Good riddance.
White puts in, was kept.
Ditto Army.
There is a very clear pattern of the players we kept and what they offer.
There is a very clear pattern of the players we let go and what they offer.
All the players who have been moved onto other clubs gave the club a reason to do so. This goes back further than Mick to include Fev.
Take a step back, look at the big picture and notice the patterns than span across multiple coaches. Its as clear as day.
EDIT:
Forgot to add this....What do you think would have happened if Mick went to the board and said he wanted to trade away Gibbs? Murphy??
What do think would happen now if Bolton asked the same thing?