Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Jim Park Voting; Round 1: Carlton vs Richmond
#39
(03-26-2016, 06:40 AM)laj link Wrote:Undermanned? They were only without Deliedo, Maric and Grigg. They would've only have triuly missed Deliedio of that lot.

Everything has to be taken in context. We were expected to be no good and pumped with our list and very nearly won. If we were a gun side and lost then a D or E, as a cellar dweller nearly beating a top 5 side, worth a B-. That's my best possible score for a loss.

I really don't care what rating you give the team.  I happen to believe that losing is unacceptable and, while I may go to a C for a hard fought loss, that's my limit.

What's a 10 goal win worth, A++++++?  How about about a 20 goal win in a grand final?

We could debate this ad nauseum, not to mention folk who refuse to give Gibbs votes, but that's not the purpose of this thread.  We all have our own way of voting and rating teams, it's subjective, and there's no right or wrong way and nothing to gain by arguing about it.
“Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don’t you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don’t you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?”  Oddball


Messages In This Thread
Re: Jim Park Voting; Round 1: Carlton vs Richmond - by DJC - 03-26-2016, 07:52 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)