(03-24-2016, 12:38 AM)Thryleon link Wrote:If your not using a car that sits so high off the ground, then you could easily lose that time.
The F1's downforces glue them to the track which make them handle much better than a V8.
There are your 7 seconds.
Lowndes would have found it easier driving the F1 car, than a V8 in the same way that a distance runner could run a sprint.
Get the sprinter to run distance and watch them fail.
That doesnt mean either is inferior superior, its simply a matter of what you get used to.
So where did the 7s go, if you are claiming down force was an issue it means the straights are out of the consideration, so now those 7s must have been across the top, so that becomes 7s out of what say 50s? It's an even bigger difference, you've made it look even worse for Button! :o
Keep in mind the F1 car they drove was modified to allow running at Bathurst, it was raised, so it had lower down force yet the driver lap times nearly matched.

The sprint / distance analogy is irrelevant.
The people I know were shocked at the timings, they would have had access to splits that are not available in the public 3 sector timings. They were very diplomatic because one of their major sponsors was one of Buttons sponsors and the sponsor had arranged the whole gig.
"Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck ....... Ruck, ruck, ruck, ruck"

