03-21-2016, 10:13 PM
(03-21-2016, 08:54 PM)LP link Wrote:You don't seriously think the club doctor runs the joint do you?
So then, who else in our club senior administration has enough of the equivalent training in technical aspects of health and injury to make recommendations to the board based on assessment of the specialist reports.
You don't seriously think the board read those reports do you?
It would be very poor governance for the board not to require some form of involvement and feedback from McKay regarding any player welfare issues. Short of actually having a medical doctor on the board, he is the next best option.
Not sure what you're arguing. That McKay actively took ownership of the risk that Thomas would never recover and now that it looks like he won't, he shouldn't be held accountable for taking the risk? And all that is fine because he's a vet and vets are better than doctors at assessing medical reports in humans?
Definitely sounds like good governance yo me.