03-18-2016, 03:52 AM
(03-18-2016, 02:36 AM)LP link Wrote:You assume we didn't and you assume it was only McKay's responsibility.
Which is likely to be as accurate as the assumption that the club sacked Fev.
Do you think we run a lemonade stand or something?
All high value contracts go to the board and they only get to the board with McKay's endorsement. Potentially, Swan took it straight there, circumventing that check (a possibility given his sacking but probably unlikely) which is about McKay's only get out clause.
Most likely is he was "convinced" that the contract should go through by Mick and Swan and for that, he would need to go.