02-10-2016, 03:38 AM
(02-10-2016, 12:28 AM)Mav link Wrote:But as Cookie points out, it's true of any organisation, even ones with a mission which you'd think would unite its personnel. Just about every organisation looks shiny and monolithic from the outside until you zoom in and see what's actually happening inside.
Just look at the police, as an example. It's easy to think of them as a brotherhood. But then you read the stories about bullying and even rape within the ranks and high-level machinations which would make Machiavelli blanche. In Victoria, Assistant Commissioner Ashby and the head of the police union, Paul Mullett, beat perjury charges arising out of a move they made on the then Commissioner of Police. When you throw in the more garden-variety corrupt relationships between some police and drug dealers, even the suggestions that some bent police helped assassinate some informers who were under police protection, it doesn't seem to be such a monolithic brotherhood.
Mate I've always said Vic Pol the second most corrupt organisation in the world behind FIFA. Only the naive can't see that!
(I don't mean you)Quote:Why, then, would it be a surprise that any elite sporting team would be as fractured and factional? After all, any success one of the team has works to the disadvantage of one or more of those competing for spots and there will always be those who would prefer individual over team success. How many footy players have done what Warnie did - trying to force their way into the team for a big game in the hope that they'll be able to rise to the occasion despite injuries or injury layoffs rather than with any real confidence that they will be able to do so?
I think football is unique in the way that it is very much a team sport whereas cricket could be viewed as an individual's game (even though played within a team).
Ignorance is bliss.
ONWARDS AND UPWARDS!
ONWARDS AND UPWARDS!

